Re: USB port idiosynchracies
- From: d_s_klein <d_s_klein@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:52:46 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 18, 10:25 am, D Yuniskis <not.going.to...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
I've played with two appliances in the past week
that each imposed what *seem* to be arbitrary
restrictions on the use of their USB ports.
The first, an NSLU2, only allows a "thumb drive"
to be used on one (particular) of the two ports
("real disks" can be used on either/both).
The second, a LinkStation, also allows only one
thumb drive (plus one printer) -- though it doesn't
force the thumb drive to a *particular* port.
Peeking inside the NSLU2 shows power is simply not
routed to the second USB port (though it could easily
be with the addition of an unpopulated ferrite bead).
I haven't taken apart the LinkStation for fear of damaging
the case -- yet. :>
I don't see why this arbitrary restriction. Unless they
simply haven't the extra 2-3W (worst case) to power an
extra thumb drive??
Are there some other USB subtleties of which I am unaware?
Or, chipset problems??
--don
I'm guessing the answer is "engineering compromises".
If you have a USB2 port, you are *required* to be able to source a
full amp to it (worst case = 5W), or turn it off if it over-currents.
Either of those costs money. 99% of the world is happy connecting one
thumb drive, or an externally powered HDD. So there you have it.
RK
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: USB port idiosynchracies
- From: D Yuniskis
- Re: USB port idiosynchracies
- References:
- USB port idiosynchracies
- From: D Yuniskis
- USB port idiosynchracies
- Prev by Date: Re: PC power button - Slightly off-topic
- Next by Date: Re: avr-gcc floating point problems
- Previous by thread: USB port idiosynchracies
- Next by thread: Re: USB port idiosynchracies
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|