Use of TRST on ST vs. Luminary ARM JTAG?
- From: Tim Wescott <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:10:14 -0600
I'm using an ST ARM Cortex part for the first time. I've been using
Luminary parts until now.
I notice that on the Olimex demo board for the STM32F103RBT6, they have
the JTAG TRST pin connected, but on the Luminary eval board for the
LM3S811 the TRST pin is left open.
Does anyone know why this is? Is it just that the TRST pin is sorta
optional, and the Luminary folks weren't in a mood to dot all their 'i's
and cross all their 't's? Is there some reason that you might _not_ want
to connect TRST?
I also see that the Olimex board has a solderable bridge to connect TRST
to the processor reset. Again -- why, do you know the advantages and
disadvantages?
I'm going to just copy the Olimex board, but I'm curious as to just what
it is that I am so blindly doing...
--
My liberal friends think I'm a conservative kook.
My conservative friends think I'm a liberal kook.
Why am I not happy that they have found common ground?
Tim Wescott, Communications, Control, Circuits & Software
http://www.wescottdesign.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Use of TRST on ST vs. Luminary ARM JTAG?
- From: MK
- Re: Use of TRST on ST vs. Luminary ARM JTAG?
- From: Vladimir Ivanov
- Re: Use of TRST on ST vs. Luminary ARM JTAG?
- From: linnix
- Re: Use of TRST on ST vs. Luminary ARM JTAG?
- Prev by Date: Re: microphones with very low current consumption
- Next by Date: Re: Use of TRST on ST vs. Luminary ARM JTAG?
- Previous by thread: What's wrong with www.8052.com?
- Next by thread: Re: Use of TRST on ST vs. Luminary ARM JTAG?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|