Re: Use of TRST on ST vs. Luminary ARM JTAG?
- From: MK <mk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:12:20 +0000
On 11/02/2012 06:10, Tim Wescott wrote:
I'm using an ST ARM Cortex part for the first time. I've been usingThe Keil Ulink interface supports JTAG and the ARM SW debug interface. SW uses fewer pins and works at least as well. Keil suggest connecting the reset pin which can be used to reset the processor from the debugger. If the software (on the target) sets the target clock to something useless (like off or too fast or very slow) JTAG won't work any more so being able to reset from the debug port is very useful.
Luminary parts until now.
I notice that on the Olimex demo board for the STM32F103RBT6, they have
the JTAG TRST pin connected, but on the Luminary eval board for the
LM3S811 the TRST pin is left open.
Does anyone know why this is? Is it just that the TRST pin is sorta
optional, and the Luminary folks weren't in a mood to dot all their 'i's
and cross all their 't's? Is there some reason that you might _not_ want
to connect TRST?
I also see that the Olimex board has a solderable bridge to connect TRST
to the processor reset. Again -- why, do you know the advantages and
disadvantages?
I'm going to just copy the Olimex board, but I'm curious as to just what
it is that I am so blindly doing...
Michael Kellett
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Use of TRST on ST vs. Luminary ARM JTAG?
- From: Leo Havmøller
- Re: Use of TRST on ST vs. Luminary ARM JTAG?
- References:
- Use of TRST on ST vs. Luminary ARM JTAG?
- From: Tim Wescott
- Use of TRST on ST vs. Luminary ARM JTAG?
- Prev by Date: Re: Use of TRST on ST vs. Luminary ARM JTAG?
- Next by Date: Re: Use of TRST on ST vs. Luminary ARM JTAG?
- Previous by thread: Re: Use of TRST on ST vs. Luminary ARM JTAG?
- Next by thread: Re: Use of TRST on ST vs. Luminary ARM JTAG?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|