Re: Bogus M$ Attachments
From: Donald Roby (droby_at_babsoncourt.com)
Date: 10/22/03
- Next message: Donald Roby: "Re: Naive, possibly silly question"
- Previous message: Uncle Bob (Robert C. Martin): "Re: Naive, possibly silly question"
- In reply to: Universe: "Bogus M$ Attachments"
- Next in thread: Phlip: "Re: Bogus M$ Attachments"
- Reply: Phlip: "Re: Bogus M$ Attachments"
- Reply: Universe: "Re: Bogus M$ Attachments"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 02:01:32 GMT
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 13:32:15 -0400, Universe wrote:
> Must be doing something right judging by the amount of bogus M$
> attachments "I'm a handmaiden of past" Phlip is sending.
>
> Elliott
Take your medication.
Those messages are from people who have scavenged your email, Phlip's
email and my email and probably lots of others from this group.
It's a simple consequence of using real email addresses in usenet
postings.
I presume you're also getting plenty of non-delivery messages about your
own alleged sending of this Microsoft patch to nonexistent addresses. I
certainly am.
I noticed on a couple of them that you and I both appear on the recipient
list. I didn't check for Phlip, but I presume he's also a victim.
And don't open those attachments if you're using an M$ OS. They're
viruses, in case you couldn't guess.
And if you get one claiming to be from me, I didn't send it either.
- Next message: Donald Roby: "Re: Naive, possibly silly question"
- Previous message: Uncle Bob (Robert C. Martin): "Re: Naive, possibly silly question"
- In reply to: Universe: "Bogus M$ Attachments"
- Next in thread: Phlip: "Re: Bogus M$ Attachments"
- Reply: Phlip: "Re: Bogus M$ Attachments"
- Reply: Universe: "Re: Bogus M$ Attachments"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
