Re: Definitions
From: Universe (universe_at_covad.net)
Date: 10/22/03
- Next message: Universe: "Re: Bogus M$ Attachments"
- Previous message: JXStern: "Re: Naive, possibly silly question"
- In reply to: David Postill: "Re: Definitions"
- Next in thread: Zix: "Re: Definitions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:30:24 -0400
"David Postill" <david@postill.org.uk> wrote in message
> | "David Postill" <david@postill.org.uk> wrote in message
> | > 01:50:59 -0700, rackri@yahoo.it (rackri)
> | > | Hi all,
> | > |
> | > | can you please help me to understand these concepts:
> | > |
> | > | - delegation
> | > | - forwarding
> | > | - indirection
> | > | - redirection
> | > | - double-dispatch
> | > <http://labs.google.com/glossary>
> | Yours and all others reading comp.object *might* be of some
particular,
> | or *special*. Least how I see things.
> There is something wrong with your first sentence and I find myself
unable to
> parse it.
>
> Particular or special what?
Excuse please.
The perspective of both your own, and that of other contributors to
comp.object, on the definitions, may be especially "on target". The
definitions of comp.object participants may be unique (particular) and
of especially high value.
For these reasons, I think it would be best for comp.object readers and
writers to give their own definitions of the terms, rather than to
advise the requester to only look up the definitions where you
suggested.
Elliott
--
*~* Theory Leads, Practice Verifies *~*
*~* Global Plans + IID (Iterative & Incremental Development) *~*
- Next message: Universe: "Re: Bogus M$ Attachments"
- Previous message: JXStern: "Re: Naive, possibly silly question"
- In reply to: David Postill: "Re: Definitions"
- Next in thread: Zix: "Re: Definitions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
