Re: Bogus M$ Attachments
From: Universe (universe_at_covad.net)
Date: 10/22/03
- Next message: Universe: "Re: Definitions"
- Previous message: Universe: "Re: Definitions"
- In reply to: Donald Roby: "Re: Bogus M$ Attachments"
- Next in thread: Phlip: "Re: Bogus M$ Attachments"
- Reply: Phlip: "Re: Bogus M$ Attachments"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:33:46 -0400
If so my apology. He has been responsible for similar untoward
shannigans in many times before.
Elliott
"Donald Roby" <droby@babsoncourt.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2003.10.22.01.52.39.102914@babsoncourt.com...
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 13:32:15 -0400, Universe wrote:
>
> > Must be doing something right judging by the amount of bogus M$
> > attachments "I'm a handmaiden of past" Phlip is sending.
> >
> > Elliott
>
> Take your medication.
>
> Those messages are from people who have scavenged your email, Phlip's
> email and my email and probably lots of others from this group.
>
> It's a simple consequence of using real email addresses in usenet
> postings.
>
> I presume you're also getting plenty of non-delivery messages about
your
> own alleged sending of this Microsoft patch to nonexistent addresses.
I
> certainly am.
>
> I noticed on a couple of them that you and I both appear on the
recipient
> list. I didn't check for Phlip, but I presume he's also a victim.
>
> And don't open those attachments if you're using an M$ OS. They're
> viruses, in case you couldn't guess.
>
> And if you get one claiming to be from me, I didn't send it either.
- Next message: Universe: "Re: Definitions"
- Previous message: Universe: "Re: Definitions"
- In reply to: Donald Roby: "Re: Bogus M$ Attachments"
- Next in thread: Phlip: "Re: Bogus M$ Attachments"
- Reply: Phlip: "Re: Bogus M$ Attachments"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]