Re: Do garbage collected languages need destructors?
From: Dave Harris (brangdon_at_cix.co.uk)
Date: 10/30/03
- Next message: Michael Feathers: "Re: How to refactor duplicated code without using helper classes?"
- Previous message: Shayne Wissler: "Re: How to refactor duplicated code without using helper classes?"
- In reply to: Robert Klemme: "Re: Do garbage collected languages need destructors?"
- Next in thread: Robert Klemme: "Re: Do garbage collected languages need destructors?"
- Reply: Robert Klemme: "Re: Do garbage collected languages need destructors?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 20:02 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
bob.news@gmx.net (Robert Klemme) wrote (abridged):
> Well, at least it has "finally":
Yes. That makes it possible to free resources by hand. However, it doesn't
encapsulate the process, which is a major point of a destructor.
-- Dave Harris, Nottingham, UK
- Next message: Michael Feathers: "Re: How to refactor duplicated code without using helper classes?"
- Previous message: Shayne Wissler: "Re: How to refactor duplicated code without using helper classes?"
- In reply to: Robert Klemme: "Re: Do garbage collected languages need destructors?"
- Next in thread: Robert Klemme: "Re: Do garbage collected languages need destructors?"
- Reply: Robert Klemme: "Re: Do garbage collected languages need destructors?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]