Re: OO's best feature survey results
From: Dave Harris (brangdon_at_cix.co.uk)
Date: 10/31/03
- Next message: Dave Harris: "Re: Do garbage collected languages need destructors?"
- Previous message: Dave Harris: "Re: Naive, possibly silly question"
- Next in thread: Topmind: "Re: OO's best feature survey results"
- Maybe reply: Topmind: "Re: OO's best feature survey results"
- Maybe reply: Topmind: "Re: OO's best feature survey results"
- Maybe reply: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: OO's best feature survey results"
- Maybe reply: Topmind: "Re: OO's best feature survey results"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 21:27 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
alfredo@ncs.es (Alfredo Novoa) wrote (abridged):
> You always need the boolean type.
>
> if a = '1' then
> ...
>
> a = '1' returns a boolean value.
>
> How would you solve this?
Treat the empty string as false and all others as true. That's not far
different to how C turns ints and pointers into booleans.
-- Dave Harris, Nottingham, UK
- Next message: Dave Harris: "Re: Do garbage collected languages need destructors?"
- Previous message: Dave Harris: "Re: Naive, possibly silly question"
- Next in thread: Topmind: "Re: OO's best feature survey results"
- Maybe reply: Topmind: "Re: OO's best feature survey results"
- Maybe reply: Topmind: "Re: OO's best feature survey results"
- Maybe reply: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: OO's best feature survey results"
- Maybe reply: Topmind: "Re: OO's best feature survey results"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]