Re: Static typing, polymorphism, inheritance
From: apm (apm35_at_student.open.ac.uk)
Date: 11/03/03
- Previous message: Darek Cieslak: "Re: Separation of gui and business layer: Duplication of data necessary?"
- In reply to: Topmind: "Re: Static typing, polymorphism, inheritance"
- Next in thread: Costin Cozianu: "Re: Static typing, polymorphism, inheritance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 2 Nov 2003 23:55:43 -0800
topmind@technologist.com (Topmind) wrote in message news:<4e705869.0311021854.14595eff@posting.google.com>...
> Typing is a classification technique, and true classification
> techniques are far more complicated than type-centric thinking
> makes it seem. If you want to do taxonomy and classification
> properly, then IS-A-based typing is just wrongheaded. It
> tries to put a simple face on a complex creature. That is
> why typing is bad in my book.
Strong typing is for weak minds, eh?
-Andrew Marlow
- Previous message: Darek Cieslak: "Re: Separation of gui and business layer: Duplication of data necessary?"
- In reply to: Topmind: "Re: Static typing, polymorphism, inheritance"
- Next in thread: Costin Cozianu: "Re: Static typing, polymorphism, inheritance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|