Re: OO's best feature survey results
From: Alfredo Novoa (alfredo_at_ncs.es)
Date: 11/03/03
- Next message: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: OO's best feature survey results"
- Previous message: S Perryman: "Re: How to refactor duplicated code without using helper classes?"
- In reply to: Tsolak Petrosian: "Re: OO's best feature survey results"
- Next in thread: Topmind: "Re: OO's best feature survey results"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 3 Nov 2003 03:33:32 -0800
tsolakp@yahoo.com (Tsolak Petrosian) wrote in message news:<a052897d.0311021057.7eaaa74a@posting.google.com>...
> > BTW numerical is a type and string is another type. You are using
> > types all the time.
> > Boolean is a type. I think you don't know what a type is.
>
> Thought you can apply type to anything (and where the confusion comes
> from) but boolean, numerical and strings are best viewed as special
> constructs and ADT.
Special construct is very fuzzy and ADT = type.
It's evident that boolean numeric and character string are types.
> Its like saying words in human languages are types
> too.
The set of all words in human languages can be a type, of course.
Alfredo
- Next message: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: OO's best feature survey results"
- Previous message: S Perryman: "Re: How to refactor duplicated code without using helper classes?"
- In reply to: Tsolak Petrosian: "Re: OO's best feature survey results"
- Next in thread: Topmind: "Re: OO's best feature survey results"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]