Re: Programming Language Productivity: The Stupidity of Programmers

From: Richard Heathfield (dontmail_at_address.co.uk.invalid)
Date: 11/12/03


Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 04:19:23 +0000 (UTC)


[followups set to comp.programming]

Muzzlebreak wrote:

> Corey Murtagh <emonk@slingshot.co.nz.no.uce> wrote in
> news:1068578455.161929@radsrv1.tranzpeer.net:
>
>> Muzzlebreak wrote:
>> <snip>
>>> What I don't like is Microsoft, constantly EXTENDING the C language
>>> into oblivion. When C++ came out, I thought, "What is this crap?"

<snip>

>>
>> Uh... Microsoft isn't even vaguely responsible for C++. They produced
>> a compiler for it, but the language itself evolved completely outside
>> their control.
>>
<snip>
>
> Yes, but when C++ first appeared, Microsoft's had the biggest libraries,

C++ first appeared (under that name) in 1983. I don't recall Microsoft
producing a C++ compiler until around 1992 or 1993. They certainly weren't
the first to produce an MS-DOS implementation of C++, let alone a Unix
version.

-- 
Richard Heathfield : binary@eton.powernet.co.uk
"Usenet is a strange place." - Dennis M Ritchie, 29 July 1999.
C FAQ: http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html
K&R answers, C books, etc: http://users.powernet.co.uk/eton


Relevant Pages

  • Re: Obstacles for Tcl/Tk commercial application development ?
    ... column is covered by the language I work on. ... int* xyz; ... then the compiler explicitly *unsets* xyz before the call to ...
    (comp.lang.tcl)
  • Re: Why in stdint.h have both least and fast integer types?
    ... You mean that we might want to specify code constraints ... Why would just asking the compiler to ... I'm not sure that the C types provide that control - or they provide the ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: Integral and non-integral
    ... > bit more convincing than compiler errors...). ... /Za switch (which turns up Standard conformance). ... > language arbitrarily has some restrictions designed to ease the ...
    (comp.lang.cpp)
  • Re: first book published on Fortran?
    ... For variables, the compiler doesn't know. ... >>language says is illegal, anything can happen. ... >>manual seems to imply that the test is done at the end of the loop. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: !generating ILAsm / compiler question
    ... The "language" is IL, for Intermediate Language or MSIL for Microsoft Intermediate Language. ... Technically, you could build a translator and then fire off a compiler, but you then have to trust the other compiler. ... As a software developer, you would prefer something where you have left your destiny under your own control, rather than partially under your control and partially under the control of another piece of software. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)