Re: Unit testing GUIs
From: Ilja Preuß (preuss_at_disy.net)
Date: 11/24/03
- Next message: Graham Perkins: "Re: Inheritance and Polymorhpism (getting back to the point)"
- Previous message: Ilja Preuß: "Re: Inheritance and Polymorhpism (getting back to the point)"
- In reply to: Uncle Bob (Robert C. Martin): "Re: Unit testing GUIs"
- Next in thread: H. S. Lahman: "Re: Unit testing GUIs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 10:55:44 +0100
Uncle Bob (Robert C. Martin) wrote:
> No doubt. We don't know how to write tests for "sounds good" or
> "looks good". To know if a GUI "looks good" you have to look at it.
> Even then the evaluation is subjective.
>
> However, you *can* write automatic tests that demonstrate that the GUI
> behaves correctly. Such tests are not intrinsically more difficult to
> write than any other kind of automated test.
A coworker of mine also wrote a small library once which could test wether
two images "looked similar", even when resolutions differed.
Take care, Ilja
- Next message: Graham Perkins: "Re: Inheritance and Polymorhpism (getting back to the point)"
- Previous message: Ilja Preuß: "Re: Inheritance and Polymorhpism (getting back to the point)"
- In reply to: Uncle Bob (Robert C. Martin): "Re: Unit testing GUIs"
- Next in thread: H. S. Lahman: "Re: Unit testing GUIs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading