Re: Test Driven Development Sample
From: Ron Jeffries (ronjeffries_at_REMOVEacm.org)
Date: 12/08/03
- Next message: Universe: "Re: Test Driven Development"
- Previous message: Ron Jeffries: "Re: Test Driven Development Sample"
- In reply to: Isaac Gouy: "Re: Test Driven Development Sample"
- Next in thread: Isaac Gouy: "Re: Test Driven Development Sample"
- Reply: Isaac Gouy: "Re: Test Driven Development Sample"
- Reply: Isaac Gouy: "Re: Test Driven Development Sample"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 09:08:17 -0500
On 8 Dec 2003 00:39:34 -0800, igouy@yahoo.com (Isaac Gouy) wrote:
>
>> When the next person comes along, he is likely to understand bowling, and to
>> be looking for bowling ideas like strike, spare, and such in the code. If he
>> doesn't find them, his work will be deterred.
>
>Is it really so likely that they will understand bowling?
>I didn't.
That may be why your algorithm looks so little like the actual domain. On the
one hand, perhaps not being tied to the domain may make it easier to find
creative solutions. On the other hand, I prefer to see code that looks like the
problem as understood by the customer.
>What if the development team is in China?
Even in China, I think that code should look like the domain where possible.
-- Ronald E Jeffries http://www.XProgramming.com http://www.objectmentor.com I'm giving the best advice I have. You get to decide whether it's true for you.
- Next message: Universe: "Re: Test Driven Development"
- Previous message: Ron Jeffries: "Re: Test Driven Development Sample"
- In reply to: Isaac Gouy: "Re: Test Driven Development Sample"
- Next in thread: Isaac Gouy: "Re: Test Driven Development Sample"
- Reply: Isaac Gouy: "Re: Test Driven Development Sample"
- Reply: Isaac Gouy: "Re: Test Driven Development Sample"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|