Re: OO, I just don't get it.
universe_at_covad.net
Date: 12/16/03
- Previous message: Isaac Gouy: "Re: Test Driven Development Sample"
- In reply to: Jan Ploski: "Re: OO, I just don't get it."
- Next in thread: Jan Ploski: "Re: OO, I just don't get it."
- Reply: Jan Ploski: "Re: OO, I just don't get it."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 15:20:09 -0500
"Jan Ploski" <jpljpl@gmx.de> wrote in message
news:brnm46$9m2$03$1@news.t-online.com...
> I know that I was very fascinated when I learned about patterns for
the
> first time and eager to memorize and apply all 24 :-). However, time
and
> experience heal such fascinations.
What was the harm in understanding "all 24"? Do you really think
knowing "all 24" was more negative than positive?
What knowledge did you learn in "all 24" that made you a worse
programmer?
Because a handful drive cars into culverts learning emergency avoidance
manuvers does that mean learning such ways to become a more skilled
driver from driving experts overall a bad thing? Does that make
learning the maneuvers worthless? Do the bad events for a handful mean
that everyone whom knows they will face nearly all of the conditions
where knowing the maneuvers will aid them, should not learn all of the
relevant ones as quickly as possible.
"All 24" to me are basic and frequently required when doing most non-toy
development.
Elliott
-- ~ Kent Beck & Ward Cunningham "Rather than try to make object design as much like procedural design as possible, I have found that the most effective way of teaching the idiomatic way of thinking with objects is to immerse the learner in the "object-ness" of the material.
- Previous message: Isaac Gouy: "Re: Test Driven Development Sample"
- In reply to: Jan Ploski: "Re: OO, I just don't get it."
- Next in thread: Jan Ploski: "Re: OO, I just don't get it."
- Reply: Jan Ploski: "Re: OO, I just don't get it."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|