Re: Test Driven Development Sample
From: Ron Jeffries (ronjeffries_at_REMOVEacm.org)
Date: 12/18/03
- Next message: Ron Jeffries: "Re: Test Driven Development Sample"
- Previous message: Joe \: "Re: [troll] Is casting ever necessary?"
- In reply to: Paul Sinnett: "Re: Test Driven Development Sample"
- Next in thread: Paul Sinnett: "Re: Test Driven Development Sample"
- Reply: Paul Sinnett: "Re: Test Driven Development Sample"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 22:33:40 -0600
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 19:05:52 +0000, Paul Sinnett <paul.sinnett@btinternet.com>
wrote:
>
>Is it enough that it contain an explicit description of Strike and Spare? Or
>does there remain some preference issue since the scoring loop can still be
>expressed without reference to the type of frame (by summing 'q')?
I don't know, what do you think? Is it more confusing to figure out a bowling
game that doesn't have 10 frames in it?
-- Ronald E Jeffries http://www.XProgramming.com http://www.objectmentor.com I'm giving the best advice I have. You get to decide whether it's true for you.
- Next message: Ron Jeffries: "Re: Test Driven Development Sample"
- Previous message: Joe \: "Re: [troll] Is casting ever necessary?"
- In reply to: Paul Sinnett: "Re: Test Driven Development Sample"
- Next in thread: Paul Sinnett: "Re: Test Driven Development Sample"
- Reply: Paul Sinnett: "Re: Test Driven Development Sample"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|