Re: To understand OOP better...
From: Isaac Gouy (igouy_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 12/28/03
- Next message: Isaac Gouy: "Re: Test Driven Development Sample"
- Previous message: Isaac Gouy: "Re: To understand OOP better..."
- In reply to: Uncle Bob (Robert C. Martin): "Re: To understand OOP better..."
- Next in thread: Topmind: "Re: To understand OOP better..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 27 Dec 2003 16:56:09 -0800
"Uncle Bob (Robert C. Martin)" <u.n.c.l.e.b.o.b@objectmentor.com> wrote in message news:<9frhuvs2ts6fmai04f3gb6teqtmtes2h20@4ax.com>...
> >Do you consider anything that involves polymorphism to be a variation
> >of OO?
> Dynamic polymorphism. Yes.
Does that correspond to one of the kinds of polymorphism described in
this old paper "On Understanding Types, Data Abstraction, and
Polymorphism"?
http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/cardelli85understanding.html
- Next message: Isaac Gouy: "Re: Test Driven Development Sample"
- Previous message: Isaac Gouy: "Re: To understand OOP better..."
- In reply to: Uncle Bob (Robert C. Martin): "Re: To understand OOP better..."
- Next in thread: Topmind: "Re: To understand OOP better..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
