Re: Qualitative vs. Quantitative Object Context Change & Dialectics

From: Universe (universe_at_tAkEcovadOuT.net)
Date: 01/22/04 

Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 19:57:26 -0500

"Brian Kelly" <brikelly@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:8c3abbd.0401211427.3dabac2b@posting.google.com...
> Please, please stop posting this stuff in the CORBA newsgroup.
>
> Thanks,
> Brian

Rather than jump off at first perusal with traditional habituated
behavior, try to think broadly not narrowly. In fact new, deep,
worthy insight most often is associated with stepping out the box.

With new and unusual material mentioning the term "object", ones first
instinct should be to honestly and truly apply one's mind and see how
the material's use of the term "object" relates to "Common Object
Request Broker Architecture" and give that some elasticity.

Take at least *5* minutes to really understand how something out of
ordinary pattern *might* be of value. Sincerely try to see what you
can get out of it related to CORBA. If you don't think of 2 things
let me know.

Cheers,

Elliott
>
> "Universe" <universe@tAkEcovadOuT.net> wrote in message
news:<9b2a2$400e0be5$97cff003$16382@msgid.meganewsservers.com>...
> > "Universe" <universe@tAkEcovadOuT.net> wrote in message
> > news:7a03d$400ddfbc$97cff003
> >
> > > *Strategically* (vs. tactically) Don't Combine 2 Basic
Oppositions
> > Into 1!
> > > *Strategically* Split 1 (seeming unity of opposites) into 2
(poles)!
> >
> > A dialectic is where 2 opposing objects form a union. Often a
> > dialectic is found to constitute or motor the essence of another
> > object. It is the interaction of the opposite objects in a
specific
> > set of conditions - a specific context - that gives the object
they
> > are the center of its contextual features and characteristics.
When
> > there is great enough change of the context the object the
dialectic
> > lives in, the nature of the interaction of the dialectic's 2
opposites
> > typically changes enough to cause a qualitative change in the
features
> > and characteristics of the object the dialectic drives.
> >
> > Key aspects of a dialectic that cause change when the context of
their
> > object changes are:
> > ~ the manner in which the 2 opposites interpenetrate one
another
> > [crudely just as each side of the I Ching symbol has a
> > circle within it of the opposite color
> > ~ the manner and conditions whereby the opposites undergo
> > mathematical like identity; i.e. how and
> > given what contexts the opposites switch, or exchange
role
> > responsibilities
> > a) at any instant they may exchange from 1 to all
> > roles
> > b) key roles for the opposites are:
> > 1) which plays the leading role
> > 2) which plays the engaging role
> > 3) which plays the parametrizing
> > (constraining) role
> > c) the Leading<=>Parametric is a significant role
> > responsibility opposition
> > d) the Engaging<=>Parametric is a significant role
> > responsibility opposition
> > ~ the manner and conditions which cause the opposites to come
into
> > overall conflict
> > ~ the manner and conditions which cause the opposites to have
> > overall unity or peace between them
> > ~ the manner and conditions which cause one opposite to
overcome
> > and eat the other opposite
> > a) this may lead to a new dialectic with totally
new
> > opposites
> > b) this may lead to a new dialectic where the
> > victorious opposite forms a new
> > dialectic with some other opposite
> > ~ the manner and conditions whereby the object the dialectic
> > resides in becomes its opposite in
> > terms of its nature, features and characteristics
> > ~ the manner and conditions which cause the dialectic to
generate
> > small quantitative changes in the
> > nature, features and characteristics of the object in
> > which it resides
> > ~ the manner and conditions which cause the dialectic to
generate
> > large qualitative changes in the
> > nature, features and characteristics of the object in
> > which it resides
> >
> > Elliott

Relevant Pages