Re: AOP [Was: Is POP AOP?]
From: Luke (luke_at_antispam.org)
Date: 02/13/04
- Next message: Paul Campbell: "Re: Design by Contract and Preconditions"
- Previous message: Michael C. Ferguson: "Re: Static member function in abstract base class"
- In reply to: Robert C. Martin: "Re: AOP [Was: Is POP AOP?]"
- Next in thread: Robert C. Martin: "Re: AOP [Was: Is POP AOP?]"
- Reply: Robert C. Martin: "Re: AOP [Was: Is POP AOP?]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 08:55:00 GMT
"Robert C. Martin" <unclebob@objectmentor.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:te9o20tr97n9im53oibh94uaf2k4io94f2@4ax.com...
> The goal of AOP is certainly to manage dependencies. AOP is a
> decoupling technique.
>
> I have not read nor heard of any principles of AOP yet. The
> technology is still pretty young. Actually, I think H.S. Lahman, and
> the folks who do Shlaer/Mellor style programming might know quite a
> bit about principles for AOD. Their technique of translation shares a
> lot of similarity with AOP.
Thanks.
I only know of an article by Martin E. Nordberg on
AO Dependency Inversion:
http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~kdvolder/Workshops/OOPSLA2001/submissions/12-nordberg.pdf
(you are cited in this article).
Regards
Luke
- Next message: Paul Campbell: "Re: Design by Contract and Preconditions"
- Previous message: Michael C. Ferguson: "Re: Static member function in abstract base class"
- In reply to: Robert C. Martin: "Re: AOP [Was: Is POP AOP?]"
- Next in thread: Robert C. Martin: "Re: AOP [Was: Is POP AOP?]"
- Reply: Robert C. Martin: "Re: AOP [Was: Is POP AOP?]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|