Re: Relational model versus object model
From: Alfredo Novoa (alfredo_at_ncs.es)
Date: 02/26/04
- Next message: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Relational model versus object model"
- Previous message: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Relational model versus object model"
- In reply to: Donald Roby: "Re: Relational model versus object model"
- Next in thread: Olivier Bertoe: "Re: Relational model versus object model"
- Reply: Olivier Bertoe: "Re: Relational model versus object model"
- Reply: Rich MacDonald: "Re: Relational model versus object model"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:24:47 GMT
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 00:27:59 GMT, "Donald Roby" <droby@acm.org> wrote:
>> You are missing the point. We can use functions and loops in DBMSs
>> although they are not 'relational'.
>
>So your point is not that everything should be in the relational model
>but that everything should be in the database?
Only everything related to data management. And it is not my point, it
is a very basic principle. Shomething you should learn in the first
week of any data management course.
Regards
Alfredo
- Next message: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Relational model versus object model"
- Previous message: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Relational model versus object model"
- In reply to: Donald Roby: "Re: Relational model versus object model"
- Next in thread: Olivier Bertoe: "Re: Relational model versus object model"
- Reply: Olivier Bertoe: "Re: Relational model versus object model"
- Reply: Rich MacDonald: "Re: Relational model versus object model"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|