Re: Layers, Levels, and DIP
From: Robert C. Martin (unclebob_at_objectmentor.com)
Date: 02/26/04
- Next message: Robert C. Martin: "Re: Interface Ownership"
- Previous message: Universe: "Re: Intuition vs following methodology and logic."
- In reply to: John W. Wilkinson: "Re: Layers, Levels, and DIP"
- Next in thread: John W. Wilkinson: "Re: Layers, Levels, and DIP"
- Reply: John W. Wilkinson: "Re: Layers, Levels, and DIP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:03:31 -0600
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 08:36:37 -0000, "John W. Wilkinson"
<john.wilkinson@spirentcom_removethis.com> wrote:
>
>Why is the Domain more abstract than a App? Assuming a 'Domain' means
>something like an application framework then I don't get it. An application
>framework is not an abstract application but an incomplete application, or
>even just a collection of domain specific utilities.
The domain contains the highest level business rules and
relationships. The domain can be used by many different applications
without change.
The applications are more specific. They use the domain to achieve
certain goals.
So in that sense the domain is more abstract than the applications.
- Next message: Robert C. Martin: "Re: Interface Ownership"
- Previous message: Universe: "Re: Intuition vs following methodology and logic."
- In reply to: John W. Wilkinson: "Re: Layers, Levels, and DIP"
- Next in thread: John W. Wilkinson: "Re: Layers, Levels, and DIP"
- Reply: John W. Wilkinson: "Re: Layers, Levels, and DIP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|