Re: TDD: Test-Driven Design or Test-Driven Development?

From: Vladimir Levin (vladimir_levin_at_yahoo.ca)
Date: 03/05/04 

Date: 5 Mar 2004 14:16:42 -0800

I didn't follow the whole thing through, but this seems like a reasonably
authoritative synopsis of the Twins Paradox. As far as I can tell, all the
answers are mutually consistent with respect to time dilation issues.

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/TwinParadox/twin_paradox.html

Here are a few other links I found interesting:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/airtim.html#c1
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/muon.html#c1

Robert C. Martin <unclebob@objectmentor.com> wrote in message news:<fu8h4093hoa9ukvngvregg7qdt4kj8nid1@4ax.com>...
> Hmmm. Are you sure about that? The Principle of Equivalence (that
> you can't tell an accelerating frame of reference from a gravitational
> field) seems pretty close to the core of GR. Again, I'm not a GR
> geek, but all that I've read about it suggests that all frames of
> reference are relative. (ergo General Relativity.)

Relevant Pages