Re: dynamic type checking - a pauline conversion?
From: Thomas Gagné (tgagne_at_wide-open-west.com)
Date: 03/16/04
- Next message: Isaac Gouy: "Re: dynamic type checking - a pauline conversion?"
- Previous message: H. S. Lahman: "Re: basic q about sequence diagrams"
- In reply to: Isaac Gouy: "Re: dynamic type checking - a pauline conversion?"
- Next in thread: Robert C. Martin: "Re: dynamic type checking - a pauline conversion?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:17:44 -0500
Isaac Gouy wrote:
> <snip>
>
>Seems like the established approach - use a high-level language where
>we can, use a low-level language if we must.
>
>Maybe we'd like to inline C with our Smalltalk code?
>http://www.exept.de/sites/exept/english/Smalltalk/frame_uebersicht.html
>
>
Yes, we would! I don't know how that would work in a VM, but eXept did
find a way to make it work.
-- .tom remove email address' dashes for replies opensource middleware at <http://isectd.sourceforge.net> http://gagne.homedns.org
- Next message: Isaac Gouy: "Re: dynamic type checking - a pauline conversion?"
- Previous message: H. S. Lahman: "Re: basic q about sequence diagrams"
- In reply to: Isaac Gouy: "Re: dynamic type checking - a pauline conversion?"
- Next in thread: Robert C. Martin: "Re: dynamic type checking - a pauline conversion?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]