Re: Why use relational tables in OO (please just take a look inside)
From: H. S. Lahman (h.lahman_at_verizon.net)
Date: 03/18/04
- Next message: Robert C. Martin: "Re: Second Dimension of Object Oriented Modelling"
- Previous message: JXStern: "Re: Second Dimension of Object Oriented Modelling"
- In reply to: Joe \: "Re: Why use relational tables in OO (please just take a look inside)"
- Next in thread: Arkadiy Vertleyb: "Re: Why use relational tables in OO (please just take a look inside)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:43:51 GMT
Responding to Foster...
>>I see basically the same outcome if one tries to overlay relational
>>construction paradigms on OO -- a bunch of VB programs with strong typing.
>
>
> Relational theory is merely an extension of set theory. If set
> theory is incompatible with OO, then OO is obviously worthless.
It is the query-based construction view of the relational model that is
incompatible, not the model itself.
*************
There is nothing wrong with me that could
not be cured by a capful of Drano.
H. S. Lahman
hsl@pathfindermda.com
Pathfinder Solutions -- Put MDA to Work
http://www.pathfindermda.com
(888)-OOA-PATH
- Next message: Robert C. Martin: "Re: Second Dimension of Object Oriented Modelling"
- Previous message: JXStern: "Re: Second Dimension of Object Oriented Modelling"
- In reply to: Joe \: "Re: Why use relational tables in OO (please just take a look inside)"
- Next in thread: Arkadiy Vertleyb: "Re: Why use relational tables in OO (please just take a look inside)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|