Re: Future of Programming?
From: Isaac Gouy (igouy_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/21/04
- Next message: Robert C. Martin: "Re: dynamic type checking - a pauline conversion?"
- Previous message: Robert C. Martin: "Re: dynamic type checking - a pauline conversion?"
- In reply to: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Future of Programming?"
- Next in thread: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Future of Programming?"
- Reply: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Future of Programming?"
- Reply: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Future of Programming?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 20 Mar 2004 20:00:21 -0800
alfredo@ncs.es (Alfredo Novoa) wrote in message news:<e4330f45.0403200320.46c90530@posting.google.com>...
> This is heresy for the reactionary OO zealots, but it is the natural
> trend of programming: To move from the "how" to the "what".
>
> The Relational Model as the direct application of Set Theory and
> Predicate Logic, was a major leap on that direction, but it is still
> unknown by the vast majority of programmers, specially the OO bigots.
Some are more interested in solving problems than demarcating technologies:
CLAIRE is an object-oriented programming language.
CLAIRE uses static type checking and dynamic type checking.
CLAIRE programming features Sets, Relations, and Rules.
http://www.claire-language.com
- Next message: Robert C. Martin: "Re: dynamic type checking - a pauline conversion?"
- Previous message: Robert C. Martin: "Re: dynamic type checking - a pauline conversion?"
- In reply to: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Future of Programming?"
- Next in thread: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Future of Programming?"
- Reply: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Future of Programming?"
- Reply: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Future of Programming?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|