Re: Second Dimension of Object Oriented Modelling
From: Universe (universe_at_tAkEcovadOuT.net)
Date: 03/23/04
- Next message: Jeff Brooks: "Re: dynamic type checking - a pauline conversion?"
- Previous message: Jeff Brooks: "Re: dynamic type checking - a pauline conversion?"
- In reply to: Jason Nocks: "Re: Second Dimension of Object Oriented Modelling"
- Next in thread: Jason Nocks: "Re:"
- Reply: Jason Nocks: "Re:"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 22:03:42 -0500
"Jason Nocks" <nocksj@sourcextreme.com> wrote in message
news:f314e$405f994f$cff54506$14463@dcanet.allthenewsgroups.com...
> Universe wrote:
>
> > "Robert C. Martin" <unclebob@objectmentor.com> wrote in message
> >
> >>clintshank@hotmail.com (Clint Shank) wrote:
> >
> >>>"Robert C. Martin" <unclebob@objectmentor.com> wrote in message
> >>>
> >>>>No need to guess. The Release Plan practice is well known and well
> >>>>documented in the XP materials. Once stories have been gathered and
> >>>>estimated, the stakeholders and developers meet to plan the next
> >>>>release. The release is typically 3 months worth of development
> >>>>effort.
> >
> > 3 months for *each* and *every* use case, for *all* domains, for *all*
> > projects,
> > for *time* immemorial?
> Did you notice that Bob used the word "typically" and that the word
> stories is in plural?
Even thinking that of all the use cases, they "typically" take 3 months is
wierd to me, if not to you.
And how does the fact stories is plural _not_ mean that RCM sees the
"typical" use case takes 3 months?
> If you don't pay much attention to what others
> post, why should we pay much attention to yours?
Well who didn't "pay much attention" given what I just remarked?
And "don't pay much attention" can be interpreted more than one way.
There's a difference between kill filing, or quasi kill filing and mis-
reading or misinterpreting with no intent to misread, or misinterpret.
Finally what was misread or misinterpreted may not have been
written to best convey the writers thinking/intention in the first place.
Cheers to you to <g>,
Especially for your GPL efforts,
Elliott
- Next message: Jeff Brooks: "Re: dynamic type checking - a pauline conversion?"
- Previous message: Jeff Brooks: "Re: dynamic type checking - a pauline conversion?"
- In reply to: Jason Nocks: "Re: Second Dimension of Object Oriented Modelling"
- Next in thread: Jason Nocks: "Re:"
- Reply: Jason Nocks: "Re:"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
