Rule against Circular Dependencies?
From: Ken (kk_oop_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 04/22/04
- Next message: Phlip: "Re: Rule against Circular Dependencies?"
- Previous message: Miguel Oliveira e Silva: "Re: Viability of Design by Contract technique with templates"
- Next in thread: Phlip: "Re: Rule against Circular Dependencies?"
- Reply: Phlip: "Re: Rule against Circular Dependencies?"
- Reply: Roger L. Cauvin: "Re: Rule against Circular Dependencies?"
- Reply: Tsolak Petrosian: "Re: Rule against Circular Dependencies?"
- Reply: Kevin Cline: "Re: Rule against Circular Dependencies?"
- Reply: Rod Davison: "Re: Rule against Circular Dependencies?"
- Reply: Robert C. Martin: "Re: Rule against Circular Dependencies?"
- Reply: Daniel Parker: "Re: Rule against Circular Dependencies?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 22 Apr 2004 06:54:33 -0700
Hi. I'm currently working on an object oriented design standard for
our project. The subject of circular dependencies between classes has
come up. My inclination is to have a rule that says they are not
allowed. However, I've been hard pressed to see such a rule
recommended out in the OO literature.
Would you recommend such a rule? Could you cite any literature that
supports such a rule?
Note that any of our rules can be bypassed via official waiver. So I
would consider a rule to be necessary if it should hold true 90% of
the time--and if violating it will create high risk of runtime failure
or cause maintenance nightmares.
Thanks!
Ken
- Next message: Phlip: "Re: Rule against Circular Dependencies?"
- Previous message: Miguel Oliveira e Silva: "Re: Viability of Design by Contract technique with templates"
- Next in thread: Phlip: "Re: Rule against Circular Dependencies?"
- Reply: Phlip: "Re: Rule against Circular Dependencies?"
- Reply: Roger L. Cauvin: "Re: Rule against Circular Dependencies?"
- Reply: Tsolak Petrosian: "Re: Rule against Circular Dependencies?"
- Reply: Kevin Cline: "Re: Rule against Circular Dependencies?"
- Reply: Rod Davison: "Re: Rule against Circular Dependencies?"
- Reply: Robert C. Martin: "Re: Rule against Circular Dependencies?"
- Reply: Daniel Parker: "Re: Rule against Circular Dependencies?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|