Messages as first class objects
From: Calum (calum.bulk_at_ntlworld.com)
Date: 04/30/04
- Next message: Daniel T.: "Re: Aggregation vs composition"
- Previous message: Ilja Preuß: "Re: Aggregation vs composition"
- Next in thread: Falk Tannhäuser: "Re: Messages as first class objects"
- Reply: Falk Tannhäuser: "Re: Messages as first class objects"
- Reply: Volker Bäcker: "Re: Messages as first class objects"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:02:31 +0100
I have read that "messages", "member functions" and "methods" are all
fairly similar concepts. For example
io.write("Hello")
is fairly unambiguous. But how many languages allow you to take a
message in isolation? e.g.
x = write("Hello") # x is a message
io.x # send message x to io
Is there any merit in treating messages as first class objects? Just a
crazy idea,
Calum
- Next message: Daniel T.: "Re: Aggregation vs composition"
- Previous message: Ilja Preuß: "Re: Aggregation vs composition"
- Next in thread: Falk Tannhäuser: "Re: Messages as first class objects"
- Reply: Falk Tannhäuser: "Re: Messages as first class objects"
- Reply: Volker Bäcker: "Re: Messages as first class objects"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|