Coherent exposition of OO?
From: Daniel Parker (danielaparker_at_spam?nothanks.windupbird.com)
Date: 06/05/04
- Next message: Michael Feathers: "Re: Coherent exposition of OO?"
- Previous message: Ilja Preuß: "Re: Why is Hungarian Notation Considered Evil?"
- Next in thread: Michael Feathers: "Re: Coherent exposition of OO?"
- Reply: Michael Feathers: "Re: Coherent exposition of OO?"
- Reply: Phlip: "Re: Coherent exposition of OO?"
- Reply: H. S. Lahman: "Re: Coherent exposition of OO?"
- Reply: Costin Cozianu: "Re: Coherent exposition of OO?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:39:30 -0400
I recently came across Chris Date's article
http://www.dbdebunk.citymax.com/page/page/622867.htm
I think even the kindest reader of Booch, Rumbaugh, and Jacobson's book, THE
UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE USER GUIDE, could agree that Date makes his point,
that the explanations of OO concepts in the book are not coherent. Can
someone suggest a book or preferably an article where the authors expound
the concepts with clarity and precision?
Regards,
Daniel Parker
- Next message: Michael Feathers: "Re: Coherent exposition of OO?"
- Previous message: Ilja Preuß: "Re: Why is Hungarian Notation Considered Evil?"
- Next in thread: Michael Feathers: "Re: Coherent exposition of OO?"
- Reply: Michael Feathers: "Re: Coherent exposition of OO?"
- Reply: Phlip: "Re: Coherent exposition of OO?"
- Reply: H. S. Lahman: "Re: Coherent exposition of OO?"
- Reply: Costin Cozianu: "Re: Coherent exposition of OO?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]