Re: Coherent exposition of OO?
From: Alfredo Novoa (alfredo_at_ncs.es)
Date: 06/23/04
- Next message: Shayne Wissler: "Re: LSP and Equal()......"
- Previous message: Robert C. Martin: "Re: Review of Agile Documentation by Andreas Rueping"
- In reply to: Topmind: "Re: Coherent exposition of OO?"
- Next in thread: Topmind: "Re: Coherent exposition of OO?"
- Reply: Topmind: "Re: Coherent exposition of OO?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:11:21 GMT
On 19 Jun 2004 11:21:55 -0700, topmind@technologist.com (Topmind)
wrote:
>I disagree. Other engineering disciplines deal with physical
>structures. Bridges and planes have certain quality and performance
>characteristics that can be relatively easily measured. Software does
>not, and "what is better" appears to be most a psychological opinion.
There are characteristics that we can measure, but this is not good
for the charlatans.
>If a plane uses too much fuel or a bridge falls down, that is not
>considered a psychological opinion.
If two software systems have the same functionality and one has 1/10
of code lines than the other and performs a lot faster that is not
considered a psychological opinion.
Regards
Alfredo
- Next message: Shayne Wissler: "Re: LSP and Equal()......"
- Previous message: Robert C. Martin: "Re: Review of Agile Documentation by Andreas Rueping"
- In reply to: Topmind: "Re: Coherent exposition of OO?"
- Next in thread: Topmind: "Re: Coherent exposition of OO?"
- Reply: Topmind: "Re: Coherent exposition of OO?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
