Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management
From: Thomas Gagne (tgagne_at_wide-open-west.com)
Date: 07/07/04
- Next message: Thomas Gagne: "Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management"
- Previous message: kk_oop
: "Re: Dependency Question" - Maybe in reply to: Thomas Gagne: "Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management"
- Next in thread: Thomas Gagne: "Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 22:10:20 -0400
Thomas G. Marshall wrote:
<snip>
>
>
> Didn't see that webpage, but if you're the one that turned me around on
> this, then thanks (!!!), and sorry for misattributing it. I just couldn't
> find the right post in that monster thread in c.o.
>
>
No problem. I'm probably not the first person to utter these words in such
close and deliberate proximity to each other. I used to spend more time in
comp.lang.java.* than I do now, which is probably where I said it in more or
fewer words.
- Next message: Thomas Gagne: "Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management"
- Previous message: kk_oop
: "Re: Dependency Question" - Maybe in reply to: Thomas Gagne: "Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management"
- Next in thread: Thomas Gagne: "Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|