Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...]
From: Phlip (phlip_cpp_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 07/29/04
- Next message: Mark Nicholls: "Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO?"
- Previous message: Daniel T.: "Re: The proper way of function encapsulation."
- In reply to: Gerry Quinn: "Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...]"
- Next in thread: Gerry Quinn: "Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...]"
- Reply: Gerry Quinn: "Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...]"
- Reply: Laurent Bossavit: "Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...]"
- Reply: Gerry Quinn: "Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:09:45 GMT
Gerry Quinn wrote:
> > > You've referred to Google before now. Do they use XP methodology to
> > > develop their search engine?
> >
> > Yes. But methodologies work on teams, not modules.
>
> Please clarify that answer. Or (better) post a link to where Google
> expound upon the methodology used in the development of their search
> engine.
Open Google. Search for Extreme Programming. Look to the right - the first
embedded advertisement.
-- Phlip http://industrialxp.org/community/bin/view/Main/TestFirstUserInterfaces
- Next message: Mark Nicholls: "Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO?"
- Previous message: Daniel T.: "Re: The proper way of function encapsulation."
- In reply to: Gerry Quinn: "Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...]"
- Next in thread: Gerry Quinn: "Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...]"
- Reply: Gerry Quinn: "Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...]"
- Reply: Laurent Bossavit: "Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...]"
- Reply: Gerry Quinn: "Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
