Re: How to package bridge pattern classes?

From: Daniel T. (postmaster_at_eathlink.net)
Date: 08/07/04

  • Next message: Matt: "Re: misconceptions on computer science" 
    Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 03:50:24 GMT

    kk_oop@yahoo.com (Ken) wrote:

    > Hi. I'm implementing the bridge pattern in Java. I'm wondering if I
    > should put each side of the bridge in its own package, or if I should
    > put all the bridge classes in one package. I'm leaning toward the
    > former, so each side of the bridge will have its protected methods
    > encapsulated from the other side.
    >
    > Any thoughts?

    I would put the Abstraction and Implementor interfaces in the same
    package and each refinedAbstraction and ConcreteImplementor in their own
    package.

  • Next message: Matt: "Re: misconceptions on computer science"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: How to package bridge pattern classes?
      ... I'm implementing the bridge pattern in Java. ... >>put all the bridge classes in one package. ... Implementor does not need any public methods. ... Abstractions in one package or to keep each in a seperate package. ...
      (comp.object)
    • Re: Packaging the Bridge Pattern
      ... I'm implementing the bridge pattern in Java. ... >>put all the bridge classes in one package. ... so each side of the bridge will have its protected methods ...
      (comp.lang.java.programmer)
    • Re: How to package bridge pattern classes?
      ... >put all the bridge classes in one package. ... and then put the derivatives in separate package. ...
      (comp.object)
    • Re: Packaging the Bridge Pattern
      ... > put all the bridge classes in one package. ... I'm leaning toward the ... Don't create a seperate package. ...
      (comp.lang.java.programmer)
    • Re: How to package bridge pattern classes?
      ... >>package and each refinedAbstraction and ConcreteImplementor in their own ... > Implementor does not need any public methods. ... RefinedAbstraction is discovered... ...
      (comp.object)