comp.object
By Author

1980 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

---

Starting: 07/15/04
Ending: 08/31/04

• A Pietu Pohjalainen
  • Re: object based (08/04/04)
  • Re: object based (08/02/04)
• Adrian Hey
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/20/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/18/04)
• Alan Balmer
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/26/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/26/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/26/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/24/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/23/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/23/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/23/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/23/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/23/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/23/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/23/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/23/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/23/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/23/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/23/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (07/22/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/22/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/21/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/20/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/20/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/20/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/20/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/16/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/16/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/16/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/15/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/15/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/15/04)
• Alan Gauld
  • Re: UML Design and associations (08/26/04)
  • Re: Virtual Functions in OO Analysis (08/19/04)
  • Re: Is a function an object? (08/16/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/09/04)
  • Re: software development major domains and examples (08/09/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/09/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/08/04)
  • Re: software development major domains and examples (08/07/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/07/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/06/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/05/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/05/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/05/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/04/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/04/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/04/04)
  • Re: What is CRM? or SCM? (08/04/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/04/04)
  • Re: in-house programming meaning (08/01/04)
  • Re: in-house programming meaning (08/01/04)
  • Re: software development major domains and examples (07/30/04)
  • Re: We might as well shut down comp.object (07/28/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/22/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/21/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/19/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/19/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/19/04)
• Alan Morgan
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (08/13/04)
• Alan Wostenberg
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/26/04)
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/25/04)
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/25/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/24/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/24/04)
• Alex D
  • Re: Rational Rose OLE -> Word (08/17/04)
  • Re: Newbie question about Cat files in rational rose (08/16/04)
  • Rational Rose OLE -> Word (08/13/04)
• Andre Schnoor
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: (07/16/04)
• Andrew
  • Testing in the world of multi-mode devices and distributed web services (08/11/04)
  • How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/11/04)
  • Advice on Automated Unit Testing and Test Driven Development (07/30/04)
• Andy Bower
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/23/04)
• AndyW
  • Re: How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/15/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/14/04)
  • OO Software Project Entropy Question. (08/08/04)
  • Re: What is CRM? or SCM? (08/04/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/21/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/20/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/19/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/19/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/19/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/19/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/19/04)
• Badavagni Crosdale
  • Hi (08/20/04)
• Bala Paranj
  • Re: composition,aggreation and acquaintance? (07/18/04)
  • Re: composition,aggreation and acquaintance? (07/18/04)
  • Re: composition,aggreation and acquaintance? (07/17/04)
  • Re: composition,aggreation and acquaintance? (07/17/04)
  • Re: object model to table design mapping problem (07/17/04)
  • subtype and super type (07/17/04)
  • Re: Techniques to find domain objects (07/17/04)
  • Techniques to find domain objects (07/15/04)
• Bill Watkins
  • UML: "Concurrent" vs. "Active" objects (08/04/04)
  • Empulsys business extensions for RUP (08/04/04)
  • Messages in UML Interaction diagrams (08/04/04)
• Bjorn Reese
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/28/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/27/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/26/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/24/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/24/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/23/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/23/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/23/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/22/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/22/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/20/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/20/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/18/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/18/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/18/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/16/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/14/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/12/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/11/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/04/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/04/04)
  • Re: We might as well shut down comp.object (07/27/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/20/04)
• Blair McGlashan
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/29/04)
• Brian S. Smith
  • Re: How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/27/04)
  • Re: Use Case Design (08/26/04)
• Bruno Desthuilliers
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (07/19/04)
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (07/16/04)
• Cagdas Ozgenc
  • Re: Is "AD-HOC polymorphism" actually Polymorphism? (08/12/04)
  • Warehouse Design & Inheritance (08/10/04)
• CBFalconer
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/26/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming:OOP and memory management (08/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: (08/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (08/12/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (08/12/04)
  • Re: Code-and-Fix for GUIs [Was: Rework] (08/05/04)
• ccalvert
  • UML Design and associations (08/18/04)
• Charlie Calvert
  • Re: UML Design and associations (08/23/04)
• Chris Brooks
  • Visitors - outstayed their welcome? (07/16/04)
• Chris Hanson
  • Re: [NEW!!] Binding together Properties of Objects (08/29/04)
• Chris Uppal
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/24/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (08/20/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/18/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/18/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/18/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/13/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/20/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/20/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/19/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/18/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (07/16/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
• Christopher Barber
  • Re: What is the Definition of Type (08/26/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (08/21/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/21/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/20/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/12/04)
• clifford shelley
  • Re: How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/26/04)
  • Re: How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/16/04)
• Clint Shank
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/06/04)
• cmedcoff_at_hotmail.com
  • Re: abstract class question (07/20/04)
• Corey Murtagh
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
• corno
  • Re: encapsulation / concealmeant / data hiding / implementation hiding / whatever you call it (07/25/04)
  • encapsulation / concealmeant / data hiding / implementation hiding / whatever you call it (07/23/04)
• crichmon
  • Re: pattern survey (07/19/04)
• Cristiano Sadun
  • Re: Database type independence (08/26/04)
  • Re: Method Design Architecture guidance needed... (08/26/04)
  • Re: graph of behavior - was Re: State vs. Data (was Re: Fans of Template Method with protected variable?) (08/25/04)
  • Re: Database type independence (08/25/04)
  • Re: What is the Definition of Type (08/24/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (08/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/20/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (08/20/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/19/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/19/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/19/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/17/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/17/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (08/16/04)
  • Re: How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/16/04)
  • Re: advice please (08/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/16/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (08/16/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/16/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/13/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/13/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/13/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (08/13/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (08/13/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (08/13/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (08/13/04)
  • Re: How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/13/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/11/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/11/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (08/11/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (08/10/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/10/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/10/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/10/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/10/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/09/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: OO & GUI: Appliaction Facade or MVC (07/16/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: design patterns overrated? (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: thesis topic (07/15/04)
  • Re: Semantics and STL/DTL (07/15/04)
  • Re: Semantics and STL/DTL (07/15/04)
  • Re: design patterns overrated? (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Semantics and STL/DTL (07/15/04)
  • Re: design patterns overrated? (07/15/04)
  • Re: design patterns overrated? (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming:OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Techniques to find domain objects (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
• cstb
  • Re: Resolved: NOT (w/ informal proof). --Was Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming:OOP and memory management (08/25/04)
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/25/04)
  • Resolved: NOT (w/ informal proof). --Was Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming:OOP and memory management (08/24/04)
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/22/04)
  • Resolved: NOT. --WAS: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming:OOP and memory management) (08/21/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/19/04)
  • Re: object based (08/10/04)
  • Re: Polymorphic dispatch overhead - was Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/18/04)
• CTips
  • Re: How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/14/04)
• Cy Coe
  • Re: Virtual Functions in OO Analysis (08/22/04)
  • Re: Virtual Functions in OO Analysis (08/21/04)
  • Re: Advice on Automated Unit Testing and Test Driven Development (08/06/04)
  • Re: Advice on Automated Unit Testing and Test Driven Development (08/06/04)
  • Re: Advice on Automated Unit Testing and Test Driven Development (08/05/04)
  • Re: Advice on Automated Unit Testing and Test Driven Development (08/04/04)
• Dagfinn Reiersol
  • Re: Database type independence (08/25/04)
  • Re: Database type independence (08/25/04)
  • Re: Database type independence (08/24/04)
  • Re: Database type independence (08/23/04)
  • Re: Database type independence (08/23/04)
  • Re: Database type independence (08/23/04)
  • Re: Database type independence (08/23/04)
  • Re: When to select Template Method over Strategy (08/20/04)
  • Re: When to select Template Method over Strategy (08/20/04)
  • Re: Visitor or Intruder? (08/20/04)
  • Visitor or Intruder? (08/19/04)
  • Validation and the Visitor (08/11/04)
• Daniel Parker
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/21/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/19/04)
• Daniel T.
  • Re: Design help...an explosion of interfaces...... (08/29/04)
  • Re: Design help...an explosion of interfaces...... (08/29/04)
  • Re: Design help...an explosion of interfaces...... (08/28/04)
  • Re: Design help...an explosion of interfaces...... (08/28/04)
  • Re: Design help...an explosion of interfaces...... (08/28/04)
  • Re: Design help...an explosion of interfaces...... (08/27/04)
  • Re: Design help...an explosion of interfaces...... (08/27/04)
  • Re: Design help...an explosion of interfaces...... (08/26/04)
  • Re: Is a function an object? (08/16/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/16/04)
  • Re: Implementation of [A]1---->*[B] (08/15/04)
  • Re: Implementation of [A]1---->*[B] (08/15/04)
  • Re: How would you guys tackle this commonly occurring problem? (08/12/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/11/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/11/04)
  • Re: How to package bridge pattern classes? (08/09/04)
  • Re: How to package bridge pattern classes? (08/07/04)
  • Re: Componsition vs. Inheritance for common getters/setters (08/04/04)
  • Re: How to handle a shared class? (08/01/04)
  • Re: The proper way of function encapsulation. (07/29/04)
  • Re: The proper way of function encapsulation. (07/27/04)
  • Re: How C++ NULL pointers can violate LSP (07/27/04)
  • Re: encapsulation / concealmeant / data hiding / implementation hiding / whatever you call it (07/23/04)
  • Re: When to select Template Method over Strategy (07/23/04)
  • Re: Design questions (07/23/04)
  • Re: abstract class question (07/21/04)
  • Re: composition,aggreation and acquaintance? (07/21/04)
  • Re: composition,aggreation and acquaintance? (07/20/04)
  • Re: composition,aggreation and acquaintance? (07/19/04)
  • Re: subtype and super type (07/19/04)
  • Re: composition,aggreation and acquaintance? (07/18/04)
  • Re: composition,aggreation and acquaintance? (07/17/04)
  • Re: composition,aggreation and acquaintance? (07/17/04)
  • Re: composition,aggreation and acquaintance? (07/16/04)
• danp
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/22/04)
• davainfotech
  • Apple : Enterprise Project Management: Uncharted Territories? (08/06/04)
  • Enterprise Project Management: Uncharted Territories? apple (08/06/04)
  • Enterprise Project Management: Uncharted Territories? apple (08/06/04)
  • apple:Project Management: Uncharted Territories? (08/06/04)
  • apple:Project Management: Uncharted Territories? (08/06/04)
  • http://www.digite.com/apple/hotnews.htm (08/06/04)
  • http://www.digite.com/apple/hotnews.htm (08/06/04)
• Dave Benjamin
  • Re: Method Design Architecture guidance needed... (08/26/04)
  • Re: We might as well shut down comp.object (07/28/04)
• Dave Harris
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (08/23/04)
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/22/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (08/20/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (08/19/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: (08/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: (08/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: (08/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: (08/14/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: (08/14/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (08/12/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (08/12/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big (07/28/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (07/24/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (07/24/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big (07/24/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (07/20/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/18/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (07/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/17/04)
• David
  • Re: How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/12/04)
• David Hilsee
  • Re: Componsition vs. Inheritance for common getters/setters (08/04/04)
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (08/04/04)
  • Re: How C++ NULL pointers can violate LSP (07/30/04)
  • Re: The proper way of function encapsulation. (07/29/04)
  • Re: We might as well shut down comp.object (07/29/04)
  • Re: composition,aggreation and acquaintance? (07/20/04)
  • Re: Java Singleton Constraint? (07/20/04)
  • Re: composition,aggreation and acquaintance? (07/19/04)
  • Re: Java Singleton Constraint? (07/18/04)
  • Re: Java Singleton Constraint? (07/18/04)
• David Postill
  • Re: No preserve=yes mechanism for Java with Rose (08/23/04)
• David Simmons
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/16/04)
• Dmitry A. Kazakov
  • Re: Resolved: NOT (w/ informal proof). --Was Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming:OOP and memory management (08/25/04)
  • Re: Resolved: NOT (w/ informal proof). --Was Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming:OOP and memory management (08/25/04)
  • Re: Resolved: NOT (w/ informal proof). --Was Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming:OOP and memory management (08/25/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/24/04)
  • Re: Resolved: NOT (w/ informal proof). --Was Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming:OOP and memory management (08/24/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/22/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/19/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/18/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/18/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/18/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/17/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/17/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: (08/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: (08/17/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (08/16/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/16/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: (08/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: (08/15/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: (08/15/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: (08/14/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/14/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/14/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/14/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/13/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/13/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/13/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/13/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/13/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/13/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/13/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/12/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/12/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/12/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/12/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/12/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/11/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/11/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/11/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/10/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/06/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/05/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/05/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/04/04)
  • Re: Code-and-Fix for GUIs [Was: Rework] (08/03/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (08/02/04)
  • Re: Code-and-Fix for GUIs [Was: Rework] (08/02/04)
  • Re: Design Pattern for creating Abstract Syntax Tree?? (08/02/04)
  • Re: How C++ NULL pointers can violate LSP (07/27/04)
  • Re: How C++ NULL pointers can violate LSP (07/27/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (07/26/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/22/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/22/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/22/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/21/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (07/21/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/20/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/19/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/19/04)
  • Re: subtype and super type (07/19/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/19/04)
  • Re: subtype and super type (07/19/04)
  • Re: subtype and super type (07/19/04)
  • Re: subtype and super type (07/18/04)
  • Re: subtype and super type (07/18/04)
  • Re: subtype and super type (07/18/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/18/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/18/04)
  • Re: subtype and super type (07/18/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/18/04)
  • Re: Polymorphic dispatch overhead - was Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/18/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/17/04)
  • Re: subtype and super type (07/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/17/04)
  • Re: TDD [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)] (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming:OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming:OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming:OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming:OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
• Doc O'Leary
  • Re: How would you guys tackle this commonly occurring problem? (08/12/04)
  • Re: Design m-to-m relationship (07/28/04)
  • Re: OO Design question (07/15/04)
• Donald Roby
  • Re: Whatever happened to reuse? (08/14/04)
  • Re: Whatever happened to reuse? (08/13/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/12/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/06/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/05/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/24/04)
  • Re: SoA Vs OO (07/17/04)
• Doug Pardee
  • Re: UML Design and associations (08/19/04)
• Doug Swartz
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/22/04)
• dover
  • Design questions (07/23/04)
  • Is interpreter pattern only used... (07/15/04)
• Dylan
  • How would you guys tackle this commonly occurring problem? (08/11/04)
• E. Robert Tisdale
  • Re: What is the Definition of Type (08/24/04)
  • Is a function an object? (08/16/04)
• EdUarDo
  • Re: Design question (07/30/04)
• Edward Berard
  • Re: Vexing Problem! (07/18/04)
• Ennesto Gerati
  • Re: Principle, Patterns and Practices - Reflexive and Cyclic aggregation (08/12/04)
• Falk Tannhäuser
  • Re: How C++ NULL pointers can violate LSP (07/27/04)
• Fatted
  • Re: Is a function an object? (08/16/04)
• fra
  • umbrello 2 poseidon (07/26/04)
• Franco Lombardo
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (07/22/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (07/19/04)
• Fredrik Bertilsson
  • Re: Database type independence (08/25/04)
  • Re: Database type independence (08/25/04)
  • Re: Database type independence (08/25/04)
  • Re: Database type independence (08/25/04)
  • Re: Database type independence (08/24/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/24/04)
  • Re: Database type independence (08/23/04)
  • Re: Database type independence (08/23/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/23/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/23/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/22/04)
  • Re: Object-orientation: Have I finally attained "high priesthood"? (08/22/04)
  • Re: Object-orientation: Have I finally attained "high priesthood"? (08/22/04)
  • Database type independence (08/22/04)
  • Re: Object-orientation: Have I finally attained "high priesthood"? (08/22/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/22/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/22/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/22/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/22/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/21/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/20/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/20/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/20/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/20/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/20/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/19/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/19/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/19/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/19/04)
  • Data-aware GUI controls (08/18/04)
• Fruits
  • Would you rape Homer Simpson until he screamed and fainted?!? (07/19/04)
• Generic Usenet Account
  • Agile Ecosystems Vs (Rational) Unified Process (08/03/04)
  • Re: Techniques to find domain objects (07/19/04)
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (07/19/04)
  • Re: pattern survey (07/19/04)
• Gerd Gotthard
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/06/04)
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/05/04)
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/05/04)
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/05/04)
  • 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/04/04)
• Gerry Quinn
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/28/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/28/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/21/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/20/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/19/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/19/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/18/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/17/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (08/03/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (08/03/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (08/02/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (08/01/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/30/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/30/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/29/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/29/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/28/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/28/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/27/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/27/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/27/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/26/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/26/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/24/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/24/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
• Goran Sliskovic
  • Re: Design help...an explosion of interfaces...... (08/27/04)
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (07/20/04)
• Graham Perkins
  • Re: software development major domains and examples (08/10/04)
  • Re: Actor for Startup Use Case? (08/10/04)
• Gregg
  • Re: History of UML diagrams UML 1.0 to UML 2.0 (08/06/04)
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (08/05/04)
  • Package Aspects - UML Distilled Third Edition (08/01/04)
• H. S. Lahman
  • Re: Method Design Architecture guidance needed... (08/31/04)
  • Re: Design help...an explosion of interfaces...... (08/29/04)
  • Re: Design help...an explosion of interfaces...... (08/28/04)
  • Re: Design help...an explosion of interfaces...... (08/28/04)
  • Re: [NEW!!] Binding together Properties of Objects (08/27/04)
  • Re: Design help...an explosion of interfaces...... (08/27/04)
  • Re: Method Design Architecture guidance needed... (08/27/04)
  • Re: What is the Definition of Type (08/24/04)
  • Re: upstream and downstream development (08/23/04)
  • Re: No preserve=yes mechanism for Java with Rose (08/23/04)
  • Re: UML Design and associations (08/23/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/23/04)
  • Re: Object-orientation: Have I finally attained "high priesthood"? (08/23/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/22/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/22/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/22/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/22/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/21/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/21/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/20/04)
  • Re: Virtual Functions in OO Analysis (08/19/04)
  • Re: UML Design and associations (08/19/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/19/04)
  • Re: Implementation of [A]1---->*[B] (08/18/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/17/04)
  • Re: Implementation of [A]1---->*[B] (08/16/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/16/04)
  • Re: advice please (08/14/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/14/04)
  • Re: Superiorto('class name') (08/14/04)
  • Re: General OOA/D/P issues (08/14/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (08/13/04)
  • Re: Part 2; COM issues (08/13/04)
  • Re: OO Software Project Entropy Question. (08/13/04)
  • Re: Superiorto(?class name') (08/13/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (08/13/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (08/12/04)
  • Re: General OOA/D/P issues (08/12/04)
  • Re: object based (08/12/04)
  • Re: OO Software Project Entropy Question. (08/11/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (08/11/04)
  • Re: General OOA/D/P issues (08/11/04)
  • Re: Part 2; COM issues (08/10/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (08/10/04)
  • Re: OO Software Project Entropy Question. (08/10/04)
  • Re: Actor for Startup Use Case? (08/10/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (08/10/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (08/10/04)
  • Re: software development major domains and examples (08/08/04)
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/07/04)
  • Re: Is "AD-HOC polymorphism" actually Polymorphism? (08/07/04)
  • Re: Choices between SQA and Developers if same amount of salary (08/07/04)
  • Re: software development major domains and examples (08/07/04)
  • Re: Superiorto(‘class name') (08/07/04)
  • Re: Design question (08/07/04)
  • Re: Design m-to-m relationship (08/07/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (08/07/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (08/07/04)
  • Re: Design m-to-m relationship (07/28/04)
  • Re: new bie (07/28/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (07/28/04)
  • Re: new bie (07/27/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (07/27/04)
  • Re: How C++ NULL pointers can violate LSP (07/26/04)
  • Re: encapsulation / concealmeant / data hiding / implementation hiding / whatever you call it (07/26/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (07/26/04)
  • Re: encapsulation / concealmeant / data hiding / implementation hiding / whatever you call it (07/24/04)
  • Re: Design questions (07/24/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (07/24/04)
  • Re: Representing a button in Activity charts (07/22/04)
  • Re: application of patterns (07/22/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (07/22/04)
  • Re: abstract class question (07/21/04)
  • Re: application of patterns (07/21/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/21/04)
  • Re: application of patterns (07/20/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/20/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/20/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (07/20/04)
  • Re: pattern survey (07/20/04)
  • Re: software engineering experience definition (07/19/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/19/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (07/19/04)
  • Re: client-server applications versus distributed applications (07/18/04)
  • Re: Factory Pattern (07/18/04)
  • Re: pattern survey (07/17/04)
  • Re: transaction lock question (07/17/04)
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (07/17/04)
  • Re: object model to table design mapping problem (07/16/04)
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (07/16/04)
  • Re: Vexing Problem! (07/16/04)
  • Re: thesis topic (07/16/04)
  • Re: Techniques to find domain objects (07/15/04)
  • Re: Is interpreter pattern only used... (07/15/04)
  • Re: thesis topic (07/15/04)
• Hamilcar Barca
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/09/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/09/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/05/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/05/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/04/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/02/04)
  • Re: in-house programming meaning (08/01/04)
  • Re: subtype and super type (07/19/04)
  • Re: subtype and super type (07/19/04)
  • Re: subtype and super type (07/18/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/16/04)
  • Re: design patterns overrated? (07/16/04)
• iamfractal_at_hotmail.com
  • Re: Object-orientation: Have I finally attained "high priesthood"? (08/24/04)
  • Re: Object-orientation: Have I finally attained "high priesthood"? (08/22/04)
  • Re: Object-orientation: Have I finally attained "high priesthood"? (08/22/04)
  • Re: pattern survey (07/21/04)
  • Re: pattern survey (07/20/04)
  • Re: Accessing Singleton via an Interface (07/16/04)
  • Re: OO & GUI: Appliaction Facade or MVC (07/16/04)
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (07/16/04)
  • Re: Is interpreter pattern only used... (07/15/04)
• Ian Upright
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/24/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/24/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/20/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/19/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/15/04)
• Ilja Preuß
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/20/04)
  • Re: When to select Template Method over Strategy (08/20/04)
  • Re: Implementation of [A]1---->*[B] (08/16/04)
  • Re: Implementation of [A]1---->*[B] (08/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/15/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/15/04)
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/15/04)
  • Re: How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/13/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/12/04)
  • Re: Principle, Patterns and Practices - Reflexive and Cyclic aggregation (08/12/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/12/04)
  • Re: Principle, Patterns and Practices - Reflexive and Cyclic aggregation (08/12/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/11/04)
  • Re: Principle, Patterns and Practices - Reflexive and Cyclic aggregation (08/11/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/10/04)
  • Re: Different contract for subclasses vs. clients (08/10/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/09/04)
  • Re: Actor for Startup Use Case? (08/08/04)
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (08/05/04)
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (08/03/04)
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (08/03/04)
  • Re: Componsition vs. Inheritance for common getters/setters (08/03/04)
  • Re: Agile Ecosystems Vs (Rational) Unified Process (08/03/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/31/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/30/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/28/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/28/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/28/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/27/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/27/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/26/04)
  • Re: How C++ NULL pointers can violate LSP (07/26/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/26/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/24/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/24/04)
  • Re: When to select Template Method over Strategy (07/24/04)
  • Re: application of patterns (07/23/04)
  • Re: application of patterns (07/22/04)
  • Re: application of patterns (07/22/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/21/04)
  • Re: pattern survey (07/21/04)
  • Re: Java Singleton Constraint? (07/21/04)
  • Re: application of patterns (07/21/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/20/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/20/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/20/04)
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (07/20/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/20/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/19/04)
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (07/19/04)
  • Re: Java Singleton Constraint? (07/19/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/19/04)
  • Re: pattern survey (07/19/04)
  • Re: pattern survey (07/19/04)
  • Re: Java Singleton Constraint? (07/19/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/19/04)
  • Re: application of patterns (07/19/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/18/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/18/04)
  • Re: subtype and super type (07/18/04)
  • Re: Java Singleton Constraint? (07/18/04)
  • Re: Java Singleton Constraint? (07/18/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/18/04)
  • Re: subtype and super type (07/18/04)
  • Re: subtype and super type (07/18/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/18/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/18/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/18/04)
  • Re: Java Singleton Constraint? (07/18/04)
  • Factory Pattern (was: pattern survey) (07/17/04)
  • Re: pattern survey (07/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/17/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/16/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/16/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/16/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/16/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/16/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/16/04)
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/16/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/16/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/16/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/16/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/16/04)
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (07/16/04)
  • Re: design patterns overrated? (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/15/04)
• Isaac Gouy
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/29/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/28/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/27/04)
  • Re: What is the Definition of Type (08/24/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/24/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/19/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/19/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/19/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/18/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/18/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (08/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/17/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (08/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/14/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/14/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/13/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/12/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/12/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/10/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/10/04)
  • Re: Is "AD-HOC polymorphism" actually Polymorphism? (08/02/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/29/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/28/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/26/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/26/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/26/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/20/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/20/04)
  • Re: Polymorphic dispatch overhead - was Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/18/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming:OOP and memory management (07/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Semantics and STL/DTL (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
• Ishan De Silva
  • Re: RBAC and "Role Hierarchies" ? (08/27/04)
  • Re: RBAC and "Role Hierarchies" ? (08/26/04)
  • RBAC and "Role Hierarchies" ? (08/19/04)
• James A. Robertson
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/14/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/13/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/12/04)
• jason
  • ANN: UML for Java Developers (08/01/04)
• Jeff Brooks
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/19/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/19/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/19/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/19/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/19/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/19/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/19/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: (08/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: (08/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/15/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/12/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/12/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/12/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/12/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/10/04)
  • Re: design patterns overrated? (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming:OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming:OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
• Jim Hughes
  • Re: How would you guys tackle this commonly occurring problem? (08/12/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/11/04)
  • Re: Different contract for subclasses vs. clients (08/10/04)
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (08/10/04)
• Jim Rogers
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/26/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/26/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/26/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/26/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/25/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/24/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/22/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/21/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/19/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: (08/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (08/13/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/24/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/24/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/24/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/21/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/21/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
• Jim Thompson
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/24/04)
• Joachim Durchholz
  • Re: SoA Vs OO (07/16/04)
  • Re: SoA Vs OO (07/15/04)
• Joe Wright
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/24/04)
• John Creighton
  • Re: Superiorto('class name') (08/13/04)
  • Re: Superiorto('class name') (08/11/04)
  • Re: Superiorto(?class name') (08/11/04)
  • Re: Superiorto(?class name') (08/10/04)
  • Superiorto(‘class name') (07/30/04)
• John Roth
  • Re: How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/14/04)
  • Re: How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/12/04)
  • Re: How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/12/04)
  • Re: Advice on Automated Unit Testing and Test Driven Development (07/30/04)
• Juhan Leemet
  • Re: How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/14/04)
  • Re: How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/12/04)
  • Re: How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/12/04)
• Julia
  • How to decorate a collection? (08/19/04)
• Justin Farley
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/23/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/19/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/16/04)
• JXStern
  • Re: Method Design Architecture guidance needed... (08/30/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/23/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/22/04)
  • Re: Virtual Functions in OO Analysis (08/21/04)
  • Re: Ruby violates hallowed Structured Programming sophistries (08/21/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/21/04)
  • Re: Is a function an object? (08/16/04)
  • Re: OO Software Project Entropy Question. (08/11/04)
  • Re: Code-and-Fix for GUIs [Was: Rework] (08/04/04)
  • Re: Code-and-Fix for GUIs [Was: Rework] (08/04/04)
  • Re: Code-and-Fix for GUIs [Was: Rework] (08/04/04)
  • Re: We might as well shut down comp.object (07/28/04)
  • Re: How C++ NULL pointers can violate LSP (07/27/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/19/04)
• Jörn W. Janneck
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
• Keith Thompson
  • Re: Is a function an object? (08/17/04)
  • Re: Is a function an object? (08/16/04)
• Kelly Hall
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/20/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/20/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/18/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/13/04)
• Ken
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/11/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/11/04)
  • Actor for Startup Use Case? (08/08/04)
  • How to package bridge pattern classes? (08/07/04)
  • Componsition vs. Inheritance for common getters/setters (08/03/04)
  • How to handle a shared class? (07/31/04)
  • When to select Template Method over Strategy (07/23/04)
  • Java Singleton Constraint? (07/17/04)
  • Are Singletons Worth Using? (07/16/04)
• KendallVScott
  • UML Author/Mentor/Trainer Seeks Work (07/29/04)
• kk_oop
  • Re: How to package bridge pattern classes? (08/07/04)
  • Re: When to select Template Method over Strategy (07/26/04)
  • Re: When to select Template Method over Strategy (07/24/04)
  • Re: When to select Template Method over Strategy (07/24/04)
  • Re: Java Singleton Constraint? (07/21/04)
• Kooter
  • Representing a button in Activity charts (07/22/04)
• Larry Weisberg
  • Umbrello information (08/03/04)
• Laurent Bossavit
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/29/04)
• lilburne
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/17/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/16/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/16/04)
  • Re: How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/15/04)
  • Re: How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/14/04)
• Loeffelholz
  • Re: Implementation of [A]1---->*[B] (08/17/04)
  • Re: Implementation of [A]1---->*[B] (08/15/04)
  • Re: Implementation of [A]1---->*[B] (08/15/04)
  • Re: Implementation of [A]1---->*[B] (08/15/04)
  • Implementation of [A]1---->*[B] (08/15/04)
  • Re: Design m-to-m relationship (08/10/04)
  • Re: Design m-to-m relationship (07/28/04)
  • Design m-to-m relationship (07/28/04)
• Malcolm
  • Re: Is a function an object? (08/17/04)
• Marc Rohloff
  • Re: Different contract for subclasses vs. clients (08/10/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (07/27/04)
  • Re: How C++ NULL pointers can violate LSP (07/26/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (07/22/04)
• Mark Nicholls
  • Re: Design help...an explosion of interfaces...... (08/31/04)
  • Re: Design help...an explosion of interfaces...... (08/28/04)
  • Re: Design help...an explosion of interfaces...... (08/28/04)
  • Re: Design help...an explosion of interfaces...... (08/27/04)
  • Re: RBAC and "Role Hierarchies" ? (08/27/04)
  • Re: Design help...an explosion of interfaces...... (08/27/04)
  • Re: Design help...an explosion of interfaces...... (08/27/04)
  • Re: Design help...an explosion of interfaces...... (08/27/04)
  • Re: Design help...an explosion of interfaces...... (08/27/04)
  • Re: RBAC and "Role Hierarchies" ? (08/26/04)
  • Re: Design help...an explosion of interfaces...... (08/26/04)
  • Design help...an explosion of interfaces...... (08/26/04)
  • graph of behavior - was Re: State vs. Data (was Re: Fans of Template Method with protected variable?) (08/25/04)
  • Re: How to decorate a collection? (08/20/04)
  • Re: Visitor or Intruder? (08/19/04)
  • Re: Visitor or Intruder? (08/19/04)
  • Re: advice please (08/17/04)
  • Re: API vs COM: Help needed (08/16/04)
  • Re: General OOA/D/P issues (08/16/04)
  • Re: Part 2; COM issues (08/16/04)
  • Re: General OOA/D/P issues (08/13/04)
  • Re: object based (08/11/04)
  • Re: Part 2; COM issues (08/11/04)
  • Re: General OOA/D/P issues (08/11/04)
  • Re: Event based/Message based systems (08/10/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (08/10/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (08/10/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (08/09/04)
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/04/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (07/31/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (07/29/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (07/29/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (07/28/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (07/28/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (07/27/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (07/26/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (07/23/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (07/23/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (07/22/04)
  • Re: Vexing Problem! (07/19/04)
  • Re: pattern survey (07/19/04)
  • Re: Visitors - outstayed their welcome? (07/16/04)
  • Re: object model to table design mapping problem (07/16/04)
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (07/16/04)
• Mark S. Hathaway
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/26/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/24/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/19/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: (08/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: (08/14/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/25/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/25/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/22/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/22/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/20/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/18/04)
  • better type construction (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming:OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming:OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
• Mark van Gulik
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/20/04)
• Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: Is a function an object? (08/16/04)
  • Re: Is a function an object? (08/16/04)
• Marty
  • Re: abstract class question (07/21/04)
  • abstract class question (07/20/04)
• Master
  • rational rose (08/05/04)
• Mathieu Malaterre
  • Re: Image library design (07/19/04)
  • Re: Image library design (07/18/04)
  • Image library design (07/18/04)
• Matt
  • Re: Workflow management (08/23/04)
  • upstream and downstream development (08/22/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/08/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/07/04)
  • What is CRM? or SCM? (08/04/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/04/04)
  • event driven model == publisher-subscriber model?? (08/01/04)
  • misconceptions on computer science (08/01/04)
  • Re: in-house programming meaning (08/01/04)
  • in-house programming meaning (07/31/04)
  • Choices between SQA and Developers if same amount of salary (07/30/04)
  • software development major domains and examples (07/30/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/19/04)
  • software engineering experience definition (07/19/04)
  • systems programming versus application programming (07/19/04)
  • client-server applications versus distributed applications (07/18/04)
  • transaction lock question (07/17/04)
  • workflow tools (07/17/04)
  • object model to table design mapping problem (07/16/04)
• Medha
  • Newbie question about Cat files in rational rose (08/14/04)
• Michael
  • Dynamic RTN Generation (08/05/04)
  • Rational Rose: Reverse Engineering (07/24/04)
  • Rational Rose: UML Generation (07/21/04)
• Michael Feathers
  • Re: Design help...an explosion of interfaces...... (08/26/04)
  • Re: Database type independence (08/23/04)
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/23/04)
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/22/04)
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/21/04)
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/21/04)
  • Re: How would you guys tackle this commonly occurring problem? (08/19/04)
  • Re: Visitor or Intruder? (08/19/04)
  • Re: Visitor or Intruder? (08/19/04)
• Michael G
  • Re: rational rose (08/06/04)
  • Re: application of patterns (07/29/04)
  • Re: application of patterns (07/29/04)
  • Re: application of patterns (07/29/04)
  • Re: application of patterns (07/22/04)
  • Re: application of patterns (07/22/04)
  • Re: application of patterns (07/22/04)
  • Re: Rational Rose: UML Generation (07/21/04)
  • Re: application of patterns (07/21/04)
  • Re: application of patterns (07/21/04)
  • Re: application of patterns (07/20/04)
  • Re: application of patterns (07/20/04)
  • Re: pattern survey (07/20/04)
  • application of patterns (07/19/04)
  • Re: Java Singleton Constraint? (07/18/04)
  • pattern survey (07/17/04)
  • Re: thesis topic (07/16/04)
  • Re: thesis topic (07/16/04)
  • Re: design patterns overrated? (07/15/04)
  • Re: design patterns overrated? (07/15/04)
• Michael N. Christoff
  • Re: Is a function an object? (08/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/26/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/22/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/22/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/22/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/22/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/21/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (07/21/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/21/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (07/20/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (07/20/04)
  • Re: SoA Vs OO (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: SoA Vs OO (07/16/04)
  • Re: SoA Vs OO (07/16/04)
• Michael Wojcik
  • Re: Code-and-Fix for GUIs [Was: Rework] (08/05/04)
• Miguel Oliveira e Silva
  • Re: Semantics and STL/DTL (07/15/04)
• Mikael Brockman
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/19/04)
• Mike
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/26/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/26/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/24/04)
  • Re: Design question (08/12/04)
  • Re: Design question (07/30/04)
  • Design question (07/28/04)
• Mike Smith
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/18/04)
  • Re: How would you guys tackle this commonly occurring problem? (08/17/04)
• Mr H
  • API vs COM: Help needed (08/16/04)
• Name
  • Re: Layered Systems and "the" Design Patterns (08/05/04)
• Nevin Pratt
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/21/04)
• news.blueyonder.co.uk
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/08/04)
• nic
  • Re: Advice on Automated Unit Testing and Test Driven Development (08/06/04)
• Nick Landsberg
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/21/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (08/03/04)
  • Re: Programming liability (was rework was dynamic...) (07/31/04)
  • Re: Code-and-Fix for GUIs [Was: Rework] (07/31/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/31/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/30/04)
  • Re: Code-and-Fix for GUIs [Was: Rework] (07/30/04)
  • Re: Code-and-Fix for GUIs [Was: Rework] (07/30/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/30/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/24/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/24/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/24/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/23/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/22/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (07/22/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/21/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/20/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/20/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/20/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/20/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/19/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/19/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/19/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/18/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/18/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/16/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/16/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/15/04)
• Nick Roberts
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (08/21/04)
• Nigel Eke
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/21/04)
• Niklas Matthies
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/17/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/16/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/16/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/16/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/15/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/15/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/13/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/13/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/13/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/13/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/11/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/11/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/11/04)
  • LSP violation or not (08/11/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/28/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/23/04)
• nikodemus_at_random-state.net
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big (07/29/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big (07/25/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/22/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/22/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/21/04)
• Nimmi Srivastav
  • Object-orientation: Have I finally attained "high priesthood"? (08/21/04)
• Noah Roberts
  • Re: advice please (08/16/04)
  • advice please (08/13/04)
• Object Developer
  • Layered Systems and "the" Design Patterns (08/04/04)
• Oliver Kellogg
  • Re: Umbrello information (08/04/04)
  • Re: umbrello 2 poseidon (08/04/04)
• Oliver Plohmann
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/19/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/26/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/22/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/21/04)
• Otis Bricker
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/19/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/18/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (08/13/04)
• panu
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/22/04)
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/22/04)
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/22/04)
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/21/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/21/04)
  • Re: Ruby violates hallowed Structured Programming sophistries (08/21/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/21/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/21/04)
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/21/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/18/04)
• Patrick May
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/24/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/24/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/22/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/22/04)
  • Re: Event based/Message based systems (08/10/04)
• Paul
  • Re: History of UML diagrams UML 1.0 to UML 2.0 (08/09/04)
  • History of UML diagrams UML 1.0 to UML 2.0 (08/05/04)
• paul campbell
  • Re: Virtual Functions in OO Analysis (08/30/04)
  • Re: Method Design Architecture guidance needed... (08/29/04)
  • Re: How C++ NULL pointers can violate LSP (07/30/04)
  • Re: Looking for a design pattern (07/29/04)
  • Re: Visitors - outstayed their welcome? (07/16/04)
• Paul E. Black
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/21/04)
• Paul Herber
  • Object-Geode mscdocument (08/09/04)
• Paulo Moura
  • ANN: Logtalk 2.20.0 is now available for downloading (08/16/04)
  • Logtalk 2.19.0 is now available for downloading (07/27/04)
• Peter Ammon
  • Different contract for subclasses vs. clients (08/10/04)
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (07/16/04)
• Phlip
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/27/04)
  • Re: How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/27/04)
  • Re: Virtual Functions in OO Analysis (08/27/04)
  • Re: [NEW!!] Binding together Properties of Objects (08/26/04)
  • Re: [NEW!!] Binding together Properties of Objects (08/26/04)
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/25/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/24/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/23/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/23/04)
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/23/04)
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/23/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/22/04)
  • Re: Object-orientation: Have I finally attained "high priesthood"? (08/22/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/21/04)
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/21/04)
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/21/04)
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/21/04)
  • Ruby violates hallowed Structured Programming sophistries (08/21/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/21/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/20/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/20/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/20/04)
  • [OT] Bruno the Bandit does Randroids (08/20/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/20/04)
  • Agility doesn't suck (08/19/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/19/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/19/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/19/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/18/04)
  • Re: Is a function an object? (08/16/04)
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/15/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/15/04)
  • Re: How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/14/04)
  • Re: Principle, Patterns and Practices - Reflexive and Cyclic aggregation (08/13/04)
  • Re: Whatever happened to reuse? (08/13/04)
  • Re: Whatever happened to reuse? (08/13/04)
  • Re: How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/13/04)
  • Re: Whatever happened to reuse? (08/13/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/13/04)
  • Re: Principle, Patterns and Practices - Reflexive and Cyclic aggregation (08/12/04)
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/12/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/12/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/12/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/12/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/12/04)
  • Re: Principle, Patterns and Practices - Reflexive and Cyclic aggregation (08/12/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/11/04)
  • Re: How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/11/04)
  • Re: How would you guys tackle this commonly occurring problem? (08/11/04)
  • Re: Contractive Delegation (08/11/04)
  • Re: OO Software Project Entropy Question. (08/11/04)
  • Re: OO Software Project Entropy Question. (08/11/04)
  • Re: OO Software Project Entropy Question. (08/11/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/11/04)
  • Re: OO Software Project Entropy Question. (08/11/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/11/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/10/04)
  • Contractive Delegation (08/10/04)
  • Re: OO Software Project Entropy Question. (08/10/04)
  • Re: OO Software Project Entropy Question. (08/10/04)
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/05/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/05/04)
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/05/04)
  • Re: Advice on Automated Unit Testing and Test Driven Development (08/05/04)
  • Re: Code-and-Fix for GUIs [Was: Rework] (08/04/04)
  • Re: Layered Systems and "the" Design Patterns (08/04/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/04/04)
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/04/04)
  • Re: Advice on Automated Unit Testing and Test Driven Development (08/03/04)
  • Re: Agile Ecosystems Vs (Rational) Unified Process (08/03/04)
  • Re: Design Pattern for creating Abstract Syntax Tree?? (08/02/04)
  • Re: Design Pattern for creating Abstract Syntax Tree?? (08/01/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (08/01/04)
  • Re: How you handle the problem? (07/31/04)
  • Re: Code-and-Fix for GUIs [Was: Rework] (07/31/04)
  • Coaching [Was: Rework] (07/31/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/30/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/30/04)
  • Re: How C++ NULL pointers can violate LSP (07/30/04)
  • Re: Code-and-Fix for GUIs [Was: Rework] (07/30/04)
  • Re: Advice on Automated Unit Testing and Test Driven Development (07/30/04)
  • Code-and-Fix for GUIs [Was: Rework] (07/30/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/30/04)
  • Re: Looking for a design pattern (07/29/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/29/04)
  • Re: We might as well shut down comp.object (07/29/04)
  • Re: application of patterns (07/29/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/28/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/28/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/28/04)
  • Re: We might as well shut down comp.object (07/27/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/27/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/27/04)
  • Re: How C++ NULL pointers can violate LSP (07/27/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/27/04)
  • Re: How C++ NULL pointers can violate LSP (07/27/04)
  • Re: How C++ NULL pointers can violate LSP (07/27/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/27/04)
  • Re: How C++ NULL pointers can violate LSP (07/26/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/26/04)
  • Re: How C++ NULL pointers can violate LSP (07/26/04)
  • Re: How C++ NULL pointers can violate LSP (07/26/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/26/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/26/04)
  • Re: MVC -- Application Model vs Domain Model (07/26/04)
  • How C++ NULL pointers can violate LSP (07/26/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/24/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/24/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/24/04)
  • Business Value [Was: Migrating a thread incrementally.] (07/24/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/24/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/24/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/24/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/23/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/23/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/23/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/23/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/23/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/23/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/23/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/23/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/23/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/23/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/23/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/23/04)
  • Re: Design questions (07/23/04)
  • Re: Happy Anniversary, Tranquility Base! (07/22/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/22/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (07/22/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/22/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/21/04)
  • Happy Anniversary, Tranquility Base! (07/21/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/20/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/20/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/20/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/20/04)
  • Re: abstract class question (07/20/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/20/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/20/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/20/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/20/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/20/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/19/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/19/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/19/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/19/04)
  • Re: Image library design (07/19/04)
  • Re: Image library design (07/18/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/18/04)
  • Re: subtype and super type (07/18/04)
  • Re: Image library design (07/18/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/18/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/18/04)
  • Re: subtype and super type (07/18/04)
  • Re: subtype and super type (07/18/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/18/04)
  • Re: pattern survey (07/17/04)
  • Re: subtype and super type (07/17/04)
  • Re: subtype and super type (07/17/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/17/04)
  • Re: subtype and super type (07/17/04)
  • Re: Techniques to find domain objects (07/17/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/16/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/16/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/16/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/16/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/16/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/16/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (07/16/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/16/04)
  • Re: TDD [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)] (07/16/04)
  • TDD [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing] (07/16/04)
  • Re: thesis topic (07/16/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: (07/16/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (07/16/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/16/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/15/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/15/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (07/15/04)
  • MVC prophesies of Geo. Herriman (07/15/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/15/04)
  • Re: Is interpreter pattern only used... (07/15/04)
  • Re: Techniques to find domain objects (07/15/04)
  • Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/15/04)
  • Refactoring [Was: Static vs. Dynamic blah blah blah] (07/15/04)
• Programmer Dude
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (08/20/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/18/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/13/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/12/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/09/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/23/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/23/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/23/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/23/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/23/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/23/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/20/04)
• qazmlp
  • Re: No preserve=yes mechanism for Java with Rose (08/22/04)
  • No preserve=yes mechanism for Java with Rose (08/21/04)
  • Design Pattern for creating Abstract Syntax Tree?? (08/01/04)
• Randy Howard
  • Re: Code-and-Fix for GUIs [Was: Rework] (08/03/04)
  • Re: Code-and-Fix for GUIs [Was: Rework] (08/03/04)
  • Re: Code-and-Fix for GUIs [Was: Rework] (07/31/04)
  • Re: Code-and-Fix for GUIs [Was: Rework] (07/31/04)
  • Re: Code-and-Fix for GUIs [Was: Rework] (07/31/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/30/04)
  • Re: Code-and-Fix for GUIs [Was: Rework] (07/30/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/30/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/29/04)
• Rene de Visser
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/12/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/11/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/10/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/10/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (07/27/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (07/22/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (07/19/04)
  • Re: Semantics and STL/DTL (07/15/04)
  • Re: SoA Vs OO (07/15/04)
• Rich MacDonald
  • Re: Is a function an object? (08/18/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (08/16/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (08/12/04)
• Richard Riehle
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/26/04)
  • Re: Resolved: NOT (w/ informal proof). --Was Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming:OOP and memory management (08/25/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/25/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/24/04)
  • What is the Definition of Type (08/24/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/24/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/22/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/22/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/21/04)
  • Re: Resolved: NOT. --WAS: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming:OOP and memory management) (08/21/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (08/20/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/20/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/19/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/19/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/18/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/18/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: (08/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: (08/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: (08/16/04)
  • Re: Whatever happened to reuse? (08/13/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/13/04)
  • Re: Whatever happened to reuse? (08/13/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/13/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/13/04)
  • Re: Whatever happened to reuse? (08/12/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/12/04)
  • Re: object based (08/12/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/11/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/09/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/06/04)
  • Re: Why is Hungarian Notation Considered Evil? (08/05/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/05/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/05/04)
• Richard Harter
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/21/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
• Richard Herring
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
• Robert C. Martin
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/27/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/27/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/27/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/24/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/24/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/22/04)
  • Re: Virtual Functions in OO Analysis (08/21/04)
  • Re: Virtual Functions in OO Analysis (08/20/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/20/04)
  • Re: Virtual Functions in OO Analysis (08/19/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/19/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/19/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/19/04)
  • Re: advice please (08/19/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/18/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/17/04)
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/14/04)
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/14/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/14/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/14/04)
  • Re: Principle, Patterns and Practices - Reflexive and Cyclic aggregation (08/13/04)
  • Re: Principle, Patterns and Practices - Reflexive and Cyclic aggregation (08/13/04)
  • Re: Different contract for subclasses vs. clients (08/13/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/13/04)
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/13/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/13/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/13/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/13/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/13/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/12/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/12/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/12/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/09/04)
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (08/09/04)
  • Re: How to package bridge pattern classes? (08/09/04)
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/09/04)
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (08/09/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/07/04)
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (08/07/04)
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/06/04)
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/06/04)
  • Re: Advice on Automated Unit Testing and Test Driven Development (08/06/04)
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (08/06/04)
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/05/04)
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/05/04)
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/05/04)
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (08/05/04)
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/04/04)
  • Re: Agile Ecosystems Vs (Rational) Unified Process (08/04/04)
  • Re: Componsition vs. Inheritance for common getters/setters (08/04/04)
  • Re: object based (08/04/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/04/04)
  • Re: How to handle a shared class? (08/04/04)
  • Re: Advice on Automated Unit Testing and Test Driven Development (08/04/04)
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (08/04/04)
  • Re: Advice on Automated Unit Testing and Test Driven Development (08/03/04)
  • Re: Code-and-Fix for GUIs [Was: Rework] (08/03/04)
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (08/03/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (08/03/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (08/03/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (08/03/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/30/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/29/04)
  • Re: We might as well shut down comp.object (07/28/04)
  • Re: We might as well shut down comp.object (07/28/04)
  • Re: We might as well shut down comp.object (07/28/04)
  • Re: new bie (07/28/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/27/04)
  • Re: How C++ NULL pointers can violate LSP (07/27/04)
  • Re: When to select Template Method over Strategy (07/27/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/27/04)
  • Re: When to select Template Method over Strategy (07/26/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/26/04)
  • Re: encapsulation / concealmeant / data hiding / implementation hiding / whatever you call it (07/24/04)
  • Re: When to select Template Method over Strategy (07/24/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/24/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/24/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/24/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/24/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/24/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/24/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/24/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/24/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/24/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/24/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/24/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/23/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/23/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/23/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/23/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/23/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/23/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (07/21/04)
  • Re: Java Singleton Constraint? (07/21/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not) (07/21/04)
  • Re: Visitors - outstayed their welcome? (07/21/04)
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (07/21/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (07/21/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/21/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/21/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/21/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/21/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/21/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/21/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/21/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/21/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/20/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/20/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/20/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/20/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/20/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/20/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/20/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/19/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/19/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/19/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/19/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/18/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/18/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/18/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/15/04)
  • Re: design patterns overrated? (07/15/04)
  • Re: design patterns overrated? (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/15/04)
  • Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: design patterns overrated? (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/15/04)
• Robert Klemme
  • Re: Is a function an object? (08/16/04)
  • Re: Check state consistency (08/10/04)
  • Re: Check state consistency (08/06/04)
  • Re: Componsition vs. Inheritance for common getters/setters (08/03/04)
  • Re: Design question (07/31/04)
  • Re: Design question (07/29/04)
  • Re: Representing a button in Activity charts (07/22/04)
  • Re: How to apply Jakarta Struts to .NET apps? (07/21/04)
  • Re: better type construction (07/16/04)
• Robert Strandh
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/19/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/19/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/19/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/18/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/16/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
• Rod Davison
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/09/04)
  • Re: Dynamic RTN Generation (08/09/04)
  • Re: Actor for Startup Use Case? (08/09/04)
  • Re: My Bank account EXPLODED (07/28/04)
  • Re: application of patterns (07/28/04)
  • Re: Design m-to-m relationship (07/28/04)
• Rod Sherwin
  • Re: Virtual Functions in OO Analysis (08/22/04)
  • Re: Virtual Functions in OO Analysis (08/21/04)
  • Re: Virtual Functions in OO Analysis (08/20/04)
  • Virtual Functions in OO Analysis (08/19/04)
• Roger L. Cauvin
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/25/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/23/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/23/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/20/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/19/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/17/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/17/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/12/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/11/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/11/04)
  • Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/10/04)
  • Re: Actor for Startup Use Case? (08/10/04)
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (08/03/04)
  • Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (07/26/04)
  • Re: Are Singletons Worth Using? (07/17/04)
• Ron Ruble
  • Re: How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/13/04)
  • Re: How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/12/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/30/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/30/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/24/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/24/04)
• Ronald E Jeffries
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/15/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/14/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/14/04)
  • Re: How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/14/04)
  • Re: How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/13/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/11/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/11/04)
  • Re: Contractive Delegation (08/10/04)
  • Re: Advice on Automated Unit Testing and Test Driven Development (08/05/04)
  • Re: Advice on Automated Unit Testing and Test Driven Development (08/05/04)
  • Re: Advice on Automated Unit Testing and Test Driven Development (08/05/04)
  • Re: Advice on Automated Unit Testing and Test Driven Development (08/04/04)
• Roy Smith
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/21/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/09/04)
  • Re: Advice on Automated Unit Testing and Test Driven Development (08/03/04)
• Scott Ellsworth
  • Re: How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/12/04)
• Serge Behar
  • Re: composition,aggreation and acquaintance? (07/20/04)
• ShadowMan
  • Re: Check state consistency (08/09/04)
  • Check state consistency (08/06/04)
  • Configuration management DP (07/30/04)
• Shane Mingins
  • Re: Virtual Functions in OO Analysis (08/26/04)
  • Re: Virtual Functions in OO Analysis (08/26/04)
  • Re: MVC -- Application Model vs Domain Model (07/29/04)
  • MVC -- Application Model vs Domain Model (07/26/04)
  • Re: Happy Anniversary, Tranquility Base! (07/21/04)
  • Re: How to apply Jakarta Struts to .NET apps? (07/21/04)
  • Re: abstract class question (07/20/04)
  • Re: design patterns overrated? (07/15/04)
• Shane Petroff
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/12/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/11/04)
• Shashank
  • Re: Event based/Message based systems (08/10/04)
  • Event based/Message based systems (08/10/04)
  • Re: subtype and super type (07/17/04)
  • Re: What's the name of this pattern? (07/17/04)
• Shayne Flint
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/04/04)
• Shayne Wissler
  • Re: [NEW!!] Binding together Properties of Objects (08/29/04)
  • Re: [NEW!!] Binding together Properties of Objects (08/26/04)
  • Re: What is the Definition of Type (08/24/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/17/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/16/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/16/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/15/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/15/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/15/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/15/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/15/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/15/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/15/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/13/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/13/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/13/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/13/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/13/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/13/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/13/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/13/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/12/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/12/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/12/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/12/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/12/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/12/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/12/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/12/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/11/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/11/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/11/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/11/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/11/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/10/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/09/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/06/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/05/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/05/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/04/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/04/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/28/04)
  • We might as well shut down comp.object (07/27/04)
  • Re: How C++ NULL pointers can violate LSP (07/26/04)
  • Re: How C++ NULL pointers can violate LSP (07/26/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/15/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/15/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/15/04)
• ShriKant Vashishtha
  • Re: Validation and the Visitor (08/12/04)
• Stede Troisi
  • How to apply Jakarta Struts to .NET apps? (07/21/04)
  • Re: Vexing Problem! (07/20/04)
  • Vexing Problem! (07/16/04)
• Steven Wurster
  • Re: How C++ NULL pointers can violate LSP (07/27/04)
• sureshvv
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/19/04)
• Sylvain
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/05/04)
• Thomas Gagne
  • Re: Resolved: NOT (w/ informal proof). --Was Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming:OOP and memory management (08/25/04)
  • Re: Resolved: NOT (w/ informal proof). --Was Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming:OOP and memory management (08/25/04)
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/23/04)
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/22/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/20/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (08/16/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (08/16/04)
  • Re: Is a function an object? (08/16/04)
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/05/04)
  • Re: We might as well shut down comp.object (08/03/04)
  • Re: Programming liability (was rework was dynamic...) (08/02/04)
  • Programming liability (was rework was dynamic...) (07/31/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/30/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (07/30/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (07/28/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/27/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/24/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/23/04)
  • Re: Semantics and STL/DTL (07/22/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/22/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/21/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/20/04)
  • Re: systems programming versus application programming (07/19/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/18/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/17/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
  • Re: Semantics and STL/DTL (07/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: (07/15/04)
  • Re: Semantics and STL/DTL (07/15/04)
• Thomas Matthews
  • Re: Is a function an object? (08/16/04)
• Tim Haughton
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/11/04)
  • Re: Event based/Message based systems (08/10/04)
  • Re: Happy Anniversary, Tranquility Base! (07/21/04)
  • Re: abstract class question (07/21/04)
• Tim May
  • Exotic languages are often useful (Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing ...) (08/21/04)
• Tim Olson
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (07/15/04)
• Tim Smith
  • Re: Method Design Architecture guidance needed... (08/30/04)
  • Method Design Architecture guidance needed... (08/26/04)
  • Looking for a design pattern (07/29/04)
• TLOlczyk
  • Re: We might as well shut down comp.object (08/03/04)
• Tom Hester
  • Re: Design question (07/31/04)
• Tomasz Zielonka
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/21/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/21/04)
• Tony
  • Re: Database type independence (08/23/04)
• Topmind
  • Re: Database type independence (08/23/04)
  • Re: Object-orientation: Have I finally attained "high priesthood"? (08/23/04)
  • Re: How would you guys tackle this commonly occurring problem? (08/12/04)
  • Re: new bie (08/04/04)
  • Re: Visitors - outstayed their welcome? (07/22/04)
  • Re: What doesn't lend itself to OO? (07/22/04)
• U-CDK_CHARLES\\Charles
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/05/04)
• Universe
  • Re: Method Design Architecture guidance needed... (08/30/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/29/04)
  • Re: RBAC and "Role Hierarchies" ? (08/29/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/28/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/27/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/27/04)
  • Re: What is the Definition of Type (08/27/04)
  • Re: Virtual Functions in OO Analysis (08/27/04)
  • Re: Virtual Functions in OO Analysis (08/27/04)
  • Re: Virtual Functions in OO Analysis (08/27/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/27/04)
  • Re: Virtual Functions in OO Analysis (08/26/04)
  • Re: What is the Definition of Type (08/26/04)
  • Re: What is the Definition of Type (08/26/04)
  • Re: Object-orientation: Have I finally attained "high priesthood"? (08/25/04)
  • Re: Virtual Functions in OO Analysis (08/25/04)
  • Re: Virtual Functions in OO Analysis (08/25/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/22/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/22/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/22/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/22/04)
  • Re: Object-orientation: Have I finally attained "high priesthood"? (08/22/04)
  • Re: Object-orientation: Have I finally attained "high priesthood"? (08/22/04)
  • Re: Agile Ecosystems Vs (Rational) Unified Process (08/19/04)
  • Re: Agile Ecosystems Vs (Rational) Unified Process (08/19/04)
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (08/19/04)
  • Re: Agile Ecosystems Vs (Rational) Unified Process (08/19/04)
  • Re: Agile Ecosystems Vs (Rational) Unified Process (08/19/04)
  • Re: Agile Ecosystems Vs (Rational) Unified Process (08/19/04)
  • Re: Agile Ecosystems Vs (Rational) Unified Process (08/19/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/19/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/19/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/19/04)
  • Re: Agile Ecosystems Vs (Rational) Unified Process (08/19/04)
  • Re: Agile Ecosystems Vs (Rational) Unified Process (08/19/04)
  • Re: advice please (08/19/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/19/04)
  • Re: Data-aware GUI controls (08/19/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/19/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/18/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/18/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/18/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/18/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/18/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/18/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/18/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/18/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/18/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/18/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/18/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/15/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/15/04)
  • Re: General OOA/D/P issues (08/15/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/15/04)
  • Re: Implementation of [A]1---->*[B] (08/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: (08/15/04)
  • Re: Implementation of [A]1---->*[B] (08/15/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/15/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/15/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/15/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/15/04)
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/15/04)
  • Re: Superiorto(?class name') (08/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/15/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: (08/15/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/15/04)
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/15/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/15/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/15/04)
  • Re: Principle, Patterns and Practices - Reflexive and Cyclic aggregation (08/15/04)
  • Re: Principle, Patterns and Practices - Reflexive and Cyclic aggregation (08/15/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/13/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/13/04)
  • Re: General OOA/D/P issues (08/13/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/13/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/13/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/13/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/13/04)
  • Re: Whatever happened to reuse? (08/13/04)
  • Re: Validation and the Visitor (08/12/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/12/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/12/04)
  • Re: LSP violation or not (08/11/04)
  • Re: Principle, Patterns and Practices - Reflexive and Cyclic aggregation (08/11/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/11/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/11/04)
  • Re: Request to Ken (RE: Coding Standards) (08/11/04)
  • Re: How would you guys tackle this commonly occurring problem? (08/11/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/11/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/11/04)
  • Re: misconceptions on computer science (08/11/04)
  • Re: OO Software Project Entropy Question. (08/11/04)
  • Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP and memory management (08/11/04)
  • Re: OO Software Project Entropy Question. (08/11/04)
• Val
  • Re: The proper way of function encapsulation. (07/28/04)
  • Re: The proper way of function encapsulation. (07/27/04)
  • The proper way of function encapsulation. (07/27/04)
• van
  • How you handle the problem? (07/31/04)
• Victor
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/24/04)
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/23/04)
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/23/04)
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/22/04)
  • Re: Coding inside the debugger (08/21/04)
• Victor Metelitsa
  • Re: Migrating a system incrementally. Was: Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming: OOP (07/26/04)
• Victor Porton
  • Re: C++ properties Library Created (was Binding together Properties of Objects) (08/28/04)
  • Re: [NEW!!] Binding together Properties of Objects (08/27/04)
  • Re: [NEW!!] Binding together Properties of Objects (08/27/04)
  • Re: [NEW!!] Binding together Properties of Objects (08/26/04)
  • Re: [NEW!!] Binding together Properties of Objects (08/26/04)
  • Re: [NEW!!] Binding together Properties of Objects (08/26/04)
  • [NEW!!] Binding together Properties of Objects (08/26/04)
• Vijay singh
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/16/04)
  • Re: Principle, Patterns and Practices - Reflexive and Cyclic aggregation (08/16/04)
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/13/04)
  • Re: Principle, Patterns and Practices - Reflexive and Cyclic aggregation (08/13/04)
  • Re: Principle, Patterns and Practices - Reflexive and Cyclic aggregation (08/13/04)
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/12/04)
  • Re: Principle, Patterns and Practices - Reflexive and Cyclic aggregation (08/12/04)
  • Re: Principle, Patterns and Practices - Reflexive and Cyclic aggregation (08/11/04)
  • Principle, Patterns and Practices - Reflexive and Cyclic aggregation (08/11/04)
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/09/04)
  • Re: 3 tier architecture: a lot of questions (08/06/04)
• Vinodh Kumar P
  • Availability of WFM newsgroups (08/20/04)
  • Workflow management (08/20/04)
• Vladimir
  • Re: How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/24/04)
  • Re: How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/24/04)
  • Re: How do you make decisions that optimize software quality? (08/24/04)
• Vladimir Levin
  • Re: Advice on Automated Unit Testing and Test Driven Development (07/30/04)
  • Re: Rework [Was: Static vs. Dynamic typing...] (07/28/04)
• Volker Zink
  • Re: Resolved: NOT (w/ informal proof). --Was Re: Static vs. Dynamic typing (big advantage or not)---WAS: c.programming:OOP and memory management (08/25/04)
• Wavemaker
  • Re: [NEW!!] Binding together Properties of Objects (08/27/04)
  • Re: [NEW!!] Binding together Properties of Objects (08/27/04)
  • Re: [NEW!!] Binding together Properties of Objects (08/26/04)
  • Re: Visitor or Intruder? (08/19/04)
  • Re: How C++ NULL pointers can violate LSP (07/27/04)
• Wolfgang Keller
  • Re: Workflow management (08/20/04)
• X3
  • Use Case Design (08/19/04)
  • Use Case Design (08/19/04)

Last message date: 08/31/04
Archived on: 08/31/04 CEST

---

1980 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]