Re: largest storage
From: Terje Mathisen (terje.mathisen_at_hda.hydro.com)
Date: 10/08/04
- Next message: Cristiano Sadun: "Re: Having difficulty refactoring a DB application"
- Previous message: Daniel Parker: "Re: On XP and debate, or the lack thereof"
- In reply to: Mitch Alsup: "Re: largest storage"
- Next in thread: Bernd Paysan: "Re: largest storage"
- Reply: Bernd Paysan: "Re: largest storage"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 10:14:57 +0200
Mitch Alsup wrote:
> Jouni Osmala <josmala@cc.hut.fi> wrote in message news:<fpV8d.298$pp.107@read3.inet.fi>...
>>Googolplexbyte
>
> There are only 10**80 atoms to 10**88 particles in the universe. Far less
> than a google, and vastly insignificant with respect to a googleplex.
"Easily" solved by storing multiple bits/particle, right?
Terje
-- - <Terje.Mathisen@hda.hydro.com> "almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching"
- Next message: Cristiano Sadun: "Re: Having difficulty refactoring a DB application"
- Previous message: Daniel Parker: "Re: On XP and debate, or the lack thereof"
- In reply to: Mitch Alsup: "Re: largest storage"
- Next in thread: Bernd Paysan: "Re: largest storage"
- Reply: Bernd Paysan: "Re: largest storage"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|