Re: XP Requirement Analysis?
From: Andrew McDonagh (news_at_andrewcdonagh.f2s.com)
Date: 10/29/04
- Next message: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Haven't done anything real with OOP yet."
- Previous message: Debbie Craft: "Re: XP Requirement Analysis?"
- In reply to: Debbie Craft: "Re: XP Requirement Analysis?"
- Next in thread: Debbie Craft: "Re: XP Requirement Analysis?"
- Reply: Debbie Craft: "Re: XP Requirement Analysis?"
- Reply: Robert C. Martin: "Re: XP Requirement Analysis?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 20:01:42 +0100
Debbie Craft wrote:
>
>
> paul campbell wrote:
>
>> This is a key point. Writing a whole load of tests before you write
>> any code
>> is *not* TDD any more than writing all the code first is. Because quite
>> obviously in
>> order to write many tests you have to (at least implicity) completely
>> design
>> the
>> API your writing tests for.
>
>
> If stories are required to be backed up by acceptance tests
> isn't this writing a whole bunch of tests first?
Yes, but those tests are completely, and always will be, totally
independent of the implementation - the code can change, the language
the system is developed in could change, heck even the platform could
change, but the Acceptance tests remain UNCHANGED and still passing.
Acceptance tests have nothing to do with TDD. Acceptance tests are not
for developers to test their code with, they are to test the system when
it is running.
- Next message: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Haven't done anything real with OOP yet."
- Previous message: Debbie Craft: "Re: XP Requirement Analysis?"
- In reply to: Debbie Craft: "Re: XP Requirement Analysis?"
- Next in thread: Debbie Craft: "Re: XP Requirement Analysis?"
- Reply: Debbie Craft: "Re: XP Requirement Analysis?"
- Reply: Robert C. Martin: "Re: XP Requirement Analysis?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|