Re: Just say no to threads [Was: Software architecture]
From: Phlip (phlip_cpp_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 10/31/04
- Next message: Vladimir Levin: "Re: Just say no to threads [Was: Software architecture]"
- Previous message: H. S. Lahman: "Re: Haven't done anything real with OOP yet."
- In reply to: Kevin Cline: "Re: Just say no to threads [Was: Software architecture]"
- Next in thread: Debbie Craft: "Re: Just say no to threads [Was: Software architecture]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 05:24:09 GMT
Kevin Cline wrote:
> I would figure out the real need to be satisfied this iteration. Then
> I would write a test for it.
Part of software engineering - and part of being a team player - is
practicing "defending" architectural decisions. If an opinion is unpopular,
its discussion needn't kneel under to "peer pressure".
This newsgroup has seen a very sad example of this effect in action.
-- Phlip http://industrialxp.org/community/bin/view/Main/TestFirstUserInterfaces
- Next message: Vladimir Levin: "Re: Just say no to threads [Was: Software architecture]"
- Previous message: H. S. Lahman: "Re: Haven't done anything real with OOP yet."
- In reply to: Kevin Cline: "Re: Just say no to threads [Was: Software architecture]"
- Next in thread: Debbie Craft: "Re: Just say no to threads [Was: Software architecture]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|