Re: Just say no to threads [Was: Software architecture]
From: Debbie Craft (d145_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 11/01/04
- Next message: H. S. Lahman: "Re: What is the difference in UML terms between a package and a component?"
- Previous message: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Haven't done anything real with OOP yet."
- In reply to: Rich MacDonald: "Re: Just say no to threads [Was: Software architecture]"
- Next in thread: Ronald E Jeffries: "Re: Just say no to threads [Was: Software architecture]"
- Reply: Ronald E Jeffries: "Re: Just say no to threads [Was: Software architecture]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 20:56:10 -0800
Rich MacDonald wrote:
> I'd be interested to know how you got that impression.
Perhaps because we are told that someone who had experience at an ebay would
have a chance to leverage that experience but there is no place in the process
that actually happens because every decision is local.
- Next message: H. S. Lahman: "Re: What is the difference in UML terms between a package and a component?"
- Previous message: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Haven't done anything real with OOP yet."
- In reply to: Rich MacDonald: "Re: Just say no to threads [Was: Software architecture]"
- Next in thread: Ronald E Jeffries: "Re: Just say no to threads [Was: Software architecture]"
- Reply: Ronald E Jeffries: "Re: Just say no to threads [Was: Software architecture]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|