Re: UML Composite Structure
From: Daniel T. (postmaster_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 12/06/04
- Next message: Matthieu Villeneuve: "Re: Deinition of OOP needed for programming language documentation"
- Previous message: Ian Oliver: "UML Composite Structure"
- In reply to: Ian Oliver: "UML Composite Structure"
- Next in thread: H. S. Lahman: "Re: UML Composite Structure"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 11:51:40 GMT
Ian Oliver <IanNOSPAM.Oliver@NokiaNOSPAM.com> wrote:
> Can someone please point to a good reference for the semantics
> of this construction other than the UML 2.0 documentation.
>
> I've a few things such as Selic's UML for Real which discusses this
> diagram type in a little detail, as well as a few others, but I've yet
> to find a good, all round description of what this diagram means, what
> constructs can be in there etc. Generally I find some literature
> confused about whether these should be treated as "object" diagrams in
> the context of a class where "parts" are templates for object
> instantiation and so on...
If you google about this subject on this newsgroup, you will find that
there is good reason for the literature to be confused...
- Next message: Matthieu Villeneuve: "Re: Deinition of OOP needed for programming language documentation"
- Previous message: Ian Oliver: "UML Composite Structure"
- In reply to: Ian Oliver: "UML Composite Structure"
- Next in thread: H. S. Lahman: "Re: UML Composite Structure"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
