Re: UML Composite Structure

From: JMF (jfavaro_at_tin.it)
Date: 12/14/04


Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:47:03 GMT


"Ian Oliver" <IanNOSPAM.Oliver@NokiaNOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:P8Xsd.31665$g4.594553@news2.nokia.com...
> Can someone please point to a good reference for the semantics
> of this construction other than the UML 2.0 documentation.
>
> I've a few things such as Selic's UML for Real which discusses this
> diagram type in a little detail, as well as a few others, but I've yet
> to find a good, all round description of what this diagram means, what
> constructs can be in there etc. Generally I find some literature
> confused about whether these should be treated as "object" diagrams in
> the context of a class where "parts" are templates for object
> instantiation and so on...

I found this article pretty useful:

    http://www.jot.fm/issues/issue_2004_11/column5

John



Relevant Pages

  • Re: UML Composite Structure
    ... > of this construction other than the UML 2.0 documentation. ... > diagram type in a little detail, as well as a few others, but I've yet ... there is good reason for the literature to be confused... ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: UML Composite Structure
    ... > of this construction other than the UML 2.0 documentation. ... In UML v2.0 there was an attempt to accommodate Component ... Engineering, as manifested in a number of layered model infrastructures, ... development with a specific infrastructure, ...
    (comp.object)
  • UML Composite Structure
    ... of this construction other than the UML 2.0 documentation. ... I've a few things such as Selic's UML for Real which discusses this ... diagram type in a little detail, as well as a few others, but I've yet ...
    (comp.object)