Why 'getters' can be bad...
aweston_at_connectfree.co.uk
Date: 01/08/05
- Next message: frebe: "Queries and OO"
- Previous message: aweston_at_connectfree.co.uk: "250,000 record JTable, yet loads 'instantly'!"
- Next in thread: Daniel T.: "Re: Why 'getters' can be bad..."
- Reply: Daniel T.: "Re: Why 'getters' can be bad..."
- Reply: H. S. Lahman: "Re: Why 'getters' can be bad..."
- Reply: cr88192: "Re: Why 'getters' can be bad..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 8 Jan 2005 00:14:40 -0800
http://imessage400.homeip.net/async1.html
- Next message: frebe: "Queries and OO"
- Previous message: aweston_at_connectfree.co.uk: "250,000 record JTable, yet loads 'instantly'!"
- Next in thread: Daniel T.: "Re: Why 'getters' can be bad..."
- Reply: Daniel T.: "Re: Why 'getters' can be bad..."
- Reply: H. S. Lahman: "Re: Why 'getters' can be bad..."
- Reply: cr88192: "Re: Why 'getters' can be bad..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
