Re: Application logic and Business logic
From: Alfredo Novoa (alfredo_novoa_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 02/28/05
- Next message: Darius Zakrzewski: "Re: Assumptions when using interfaces"
- Previous message: Thomas Gagne: "Re: Application logic and Business logic"
- In reply to: Thomas Gagne: "Re: Application logic and Business logic"
- Next in thread: Thomas Gagne: "Re: Application logic and Business logic"
- Reply: Thomas Gagne: "Re: Application logic and Business logic"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:57:05 +0100
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:40:41 -0500, Thomas Gagne
<tgagne@wide-open-west.com> wrote:
>Better to treat the database as a huge object that hides its data (table,
>rows, fields, organization, syntax, etc.) behind methods (stored procedures)
>which are the only way to transact with it.
Stored procedures are a very bad and primitive way to transact with a
DBMS.
It would be a lot better to use a high level declarative relational
language.
Regards
- Next message: Darius Zakrzewski: "Re: Assumptions when using interfaces"
- Previous message: Thomas Gagne: "Re: Application logic and Business logic"
- In reply to: Thomas Gagne: "Re: Application logic and Business logic"
- Next in thread: Thomas Gagne: "Re: Application logic and Business logic"
- Reply: Thomas Gagne: "Re: Application logic and Business logic"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|