Re: OO vs. RDB challenge
From: Alfredo Novoa (alfredo_novoa_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 03/15/05
- Next message: bruno modulix: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Previous message: Dmitry A. Kazakov: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- In reply to: Dmitry A. Kazakov: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Next in thread: Dmitry A. Kazakov: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Reply: Dmitry A. Kazakov: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 14:15:04 +0100
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 14:06:38 +0100, "Dmitry A. Kazakov"
<mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote:
>>>Let you have an old 7"
>>>floppy, but no RT-11 OS under which this floppy was written?
>>
>> Then you don't have data.
>
>Very true. No matter whether each ferromagnetic particles run an RDBMS or
>not. Without the application there is no data.
An RDBMS is a set of applications that often includes a
presentation/communication application called "console".
Applications are more user friendly substitutes of the DBMS console.
Regards
- Next message: bruno modulix: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Previous message: Dmitry A. Kazakov: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- In reply to: Dmitry A. Kazakov: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Next in thread: Dmitry A. Kazakov: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Reply: Dmitry A. Kazakov: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|