Re: OO vs. RDB challenge
From: Remi Bastide (FirstName.LastName_at_irit.fr)
Date: 03/15/05
- Next message: Patrick May: "Re: Application logic and Business logic"
- Previous message: bruno modulix: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- In reply to: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Next in thread: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Reply: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 14:55:02 +0100
Alfredo Novoa <alfredo_novoa@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 13:06:32 +0100, Remi Bastide
><FirstName.LastName@irit.fr> wrote:
>
>>>Business logic are: database structure, database constraints and
>>>database derivation rules.
>>>
>>
>>I'd say the above are "possible implementations of business logic",
>>rather than "Business logic".
>>Don't confuse the implementation with the concept being implemented.
>
>Who is confusing the concept with the implementation is you.
>
>Constraints and derivation rules are logical concepts and not
>implementation.
>
>You can implement a database constraint in the app although it is a
>bad idea.
>
>What is implementation are indices and all that Bruno mentioned.
"When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail"
- Next message: Patrick May: "Re: Application logic and Business logic"
- Previous message: bruno modulix: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- In reply to: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Next in thread: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Reply: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]