Re: Application logic and Business logic

From: Patrick May (pjm_at_spe.com)
Date: 03/20/05 

Date: 20 Mar 2005 18:31:19 +0000

"topmind" <topmind@technologist.com> writes:
> The burden of evidence is not on me. I don't claim that my pet
> approaches are objectively better. I suspect much of paradigm and
> technique choice is personal preference, a mind-fit. The real world
> is generally a big messy graph; not a tree; not tables; not objects;
> but a big tangled mess. Most paradigms and techniques are simply
> useful approximations to help *us* manage the complexy as humans
> rather than something that mirrors external laws of nature or laws
> of change (if there is such a thing).

     And another Bryce Jacobs thread draws to a close, not with a bang
but a whimper of excessive context snipping, refusal to support
assertions, and clear demonstrations of a lack of understanding of the
technology being discussed in this newsgroup.

     What is your purpose in participating here?

Sincerely,

Patrick

------------------------------------------------------------------------
S P Engineering, Inc. | The experts in large scale distributed OO
                         | systems design and implementation.
          pjm@spe.com | (C++, Java, ObjectStore, Oracle, CORBA, UML)