Re: OO vs. RDB challenge
From: Costin Cozianu (c_cozianu_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 03/20/05
- Next message: Shayne Wissler: "Re: The design is the code?"
- Previous message: Robert C. Martin: "Re: Design is intent."
- In reply to: alex99_at_medcentral.com.au: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Next in thread: Jeff Brooks: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Reply: Jeff Brooks: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Reply: alex99_at_medcentral.com.au: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 13:41:14 -0800
alex99@medcentral.com.au wrote:
> Costin Cozianu wrote:
>
>>alex99@medcentral.com.au wrote:
>>
>>>Costin Cozianu wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>alex99@medcentral.com.au wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Costin Cozianu wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>alex99@medcentral.com.au wrote:
>
>
> SNIP.
>
>
>>You're all just brochure speak. If you were expecting an intelligent
>>discussion, you wouldn't be trolling me.
>
>
>>You either have something *technical* and *concrete* and *relevant*
>>(claiming that SQL cannot control rocket engines is technically true,
>
>
>>but irrelevant to the point of being idiotic), or else this
>>"intelligent" discussion is over.
>
>
> Your reply amazes me. I assure you I am not trolling anyone.
>
> Can you spell out if that wiki page is only about the SQL challenge or
> about relational and object oriented technology in general.
>
> The page talks about the general case but here you seem to insist on
> strict adherence only to the SQL oriented challenge?
>
> Which is it, please clarify.
>
I don't understand where you get such non-sense as implying that I
insist on a non-existent SQL challenge. Using SQL is just one of
possible solutions. Other solutions have failed to materialize but a lot
of handwaving, including yours have been done instead.
The challenge is clearly spelled, it is about providing an interface
behind which the client code can manage a typical many to many
relationship, under the normal constraints most modern software have to
face, including concurrent operation.
More than that I do not understand what you want me to clarify.
- Next message: Shayne Wissler: "Re: The design is the code?"
- Previous message: Robert C. Martin: "Re: Design is intent."
- In reply to: alex99_at_medcentral.com.au: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Next in thread: Jeff Brooks: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Reply: Jeff Brooks: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Reply: alex99_at_medcentral.com.au: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|