Re: OO vs. RDB challenge
alex99_at_medcentral.com.au
Date: 03/21/05
- Next message: alex99_at_medcentral.com.au: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Previous message: Daniel T.: "Re: Factory Design Pattern and Select Case"
- In reply to: frebe: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Next in thread: frebe: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Reply: frebe: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 20 Mar 2005 18:18:00 -0800
frebe wrote:
> >>There are a standard named ANSI SQL. All major database
> >> vendors supports a very large subset of this standard.
> > Really, that's news to me. Everytime I use SQL I get bitten by
vendor
> > specifics.
> I have recently converted a large enterprise application originally
> written for Informix, to support Oracle and SQL Server as well.
99,99%
> of the SQL statements are identical for all dialects.
In your SQL statements did you use any of Oracle's date related
functions? They where screwed up in version 3, they are still screwed
in version 9.
Are the Date (and most other) functions part of the ANSI standard?
- Next message: alex99_at_medcentral.com.au: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Previous message: Daniel T.: "Re: Factory Design Pattern and Select Case"
- In reply to: frebe: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Next in thread: frebe: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Reply: frebe: "Re: OO vs. RDB challenge"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|