comp.object
By Author

1223 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

---

Starting: 02/28/05
Ending: 03/30/05

• -
  • help with uml (03/29/05)
• adaworks_at_sbcglobal.net
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/26/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/25/05)
  • Re: requirement engineering versus analysis (03/20/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/20/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/20/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/20/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/17/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/17/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/16/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/16/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/16/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/10/05)
  • Re: Liskov Substitution Principle and Abstract Factories (03/01/05)
  • Re: what is a "typed" OO language? (03/01/05)
• alampro_at_yahoo.com
  • Reference Variables (03/22/05)
• Alan Gauld
  • Re: Case for Using UML (03/01/05)
• Alex Vinokur
  • How to write Request For Proposal (RFP) in Information Technology? (03/03/05)
• alex99_at_medcentral.com.au
  • Re: Factory Design Pattern and Select Case (03/23/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/23/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/23/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/23/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/22/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/22/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/21/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/21/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/21/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/21/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/21/05)
  • Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically? (03/21/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/21/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/21/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/20/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/20/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/20/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/20/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/20/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/20/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/20/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/20/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/20/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/20/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/20/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/19/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/19/05)
  • Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically? (03/18/05)
  • Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically? (03/18/05)
  • Re: New job and I want to change the world... (03/18/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/18/05)
  • Re: How would u see MVP working with a Wizard? (03/18/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/14/05)
  • Re: MVC in C++ (03/02/05)
• Alfredo Novoa
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/29/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/29/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/29/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/29/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/29/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/29/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/26/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/24/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/24/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/22/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/22/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/22/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/22/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/22/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/22/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/22/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/22/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/22/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/22/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/16/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/16/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/16/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/16/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/15/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/15/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/15/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/15/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/15/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/15/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/15/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/15/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/15/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/15/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Approach for the following scenario? (03/13/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/13/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/13/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/13/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/13/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/13/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/13/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/13/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/13/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/12/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/12/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/12/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/12/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/12/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/11/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/11/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/11/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/11/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/10/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/10/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/10/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/10/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/10/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/10/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/09/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/09/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/09/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/09/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/09/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/09/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/08/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/08/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/08/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/08/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/08/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/04/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/02/05)
  • Re: Case for Using UML (03/02/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/02/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/01/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/01/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/01/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/01/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/01/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (02/28/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (02/28/05)
• Andreas
  • On the combination of AOP and GP (03/26/05)
• Andrew Gabb
  • Re: requirement engineering versus analysis (03/12/05)
• Andrew McDonagh
  • Re: Factory Design Pattern and Select Case (03/25/05)
  • Re: Need help with an odd method (03/21/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
• AndyW
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/28/05)
  • Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically? (03/12/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/11/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/11/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/11/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/11/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/10/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/10/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/10/05)
  • Re: requirement engineering versus analysis (03/09/05)
  • Re: User Interface for the Printer Device Driver - Designing (Patterns) (03/08/05)
• Anthony Borla
  • Re: Reference Variables (03/23/05)
• beliavsky_at_aol.com
  • Re: Case for Using UML (03/02/05)
• Berislav Lopac
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/21/05)
• Bjorn Reese
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/24/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/23/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/22/05)
  • Re: Use Case Point Estimation (03/22/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/22/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/20/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/16/05)
• Bruno Desthuilliers
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/15/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/15/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/12/05)
• bruno modulix
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/15/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/15/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/14/05)
• Calum Grant
  • Re: Proper UML modeling (03/28/05)
  • Re: Multiplicity of 0..1 on composition end (03/26/05)
  • Re: New job and I want to change the world... (03/24/05)
• cfp2005_at_micai.org
  • [CFP] MICAI-2005, Mexican International conference on ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (Springer LNAI) (03/05/05)
• Charles Krug
  • Re: Need help with an odd method (03/24/05)
  • Re: Need help with an odd method (03/22/05)
  • Need help with an odd method (03/21/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/14/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/12/05)
• Costin Cozianu
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/29/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/29/05)
  • Re: Factory Design Pattern and Select Case (03/25/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/25/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/25/05)
  • Re: Factory Design Pattern and Select Case (03/25/05)
  • Re: Factory Design Pattern and Select Case (03/25/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/25/05)
  • Re: Factory Design Pattern and Select Case (03/24/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/24/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/24/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/24/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/23/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/23/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/22/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/21/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/21/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/21/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/20/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/20/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/20/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/18/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/16/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/15/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/14/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/14/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/12/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/12/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/12/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/11/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/11/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/11/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/11/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/11/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/11/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/10/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/10/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/10/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/10/05)
  • OO vs. RDB challenge (03/09/05)
• cpu16x1832_at_wmconnect.com
  • Use Jesus Christ (03/05/05)
• cr88192
  • Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically? (03/19/05)
  • Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically? (03/19/05)
• cstb
  • Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically? (03/18/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/18/05)
• Daniel Parker
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/22/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/21/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/21/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/20/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/20/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/18/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/15/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically? (03/12/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/10/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/10/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/08/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/08/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/04/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/04/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/04/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/04/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/04/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: How to write Request For Proposal (RFP) in Information Technology? (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
• Daniel T.
  • Re: Factory Design Pattern and Select Case (03/21/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/13/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/12/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/09/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/08/05)
  • Re: MVC in C++ (03/02/05)
• David Alex Lamb
  • Re: Case for Using UML (03/04/05)
• David Gilliland
  • Re: interfaces in APIs (03/25/05)
• Davide Di Ruscio
  • Model Transformations Composition VS Model Weaving (03/03/05)
  • Model Transformation Composition VS Model Weaving (03/03/05)
• dean hully
  • Factory Design Pattern and Select Case (03/19/05)
• Dirk Draheim
  • CFP: VLDB Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Application Architecture (TEAA 2005) (03/24/05)
• DKode
  • Proper UML modeling (03/15/05)
• Dmitry A. Kazakov
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/29/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/29/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/28/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/28/05)
  • Re: overloading - need good approach (03/26/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/22/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/20/05)
  • Re: Factory Design Pattern and Select Case (03/20/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/16/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/16/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/15/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/15/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/15/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/12/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/12/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/12/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/12/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/11/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/11/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/11/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/11/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/11/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/11/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/11/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/11/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/11/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/10/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/10/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/09/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/09/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/09/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/09/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/09/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/08/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/08/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/08/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/08/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/08/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Liskov Substitution Principle and Abstract Factories (03/01/05)
  • Re: creaping coupling...... (03/01/05)
• Doc O'Leary
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/23/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/22/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/21/05)
  • Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes. (03/19/05)
  • Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes. (03/19/05)
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/18/05)
  • Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes. (03/18/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/16/05)
  • Re: New job and I want to change the world... (03/16/05)
  • Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes. (03/16/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/15/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/15/05)
  • Re: New job and I want to change the world... (03/15/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/14/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/14/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/13/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/12/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/11/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/10/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/10/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/10/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/09/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/09/05)
  • Re: Case for Using UML (03/02/05)
• Donald F. McLean
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/08/05)
• Edward Berard
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/20/05)
• Edward V. Berard
  • [ANN] Short Course on Testing Object-Oriented Software (03/19/05)
• Eric Mutta
  • Re: Case for Using UML (03/01/05)
• EventHelix.com
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/12/05)
  • Re: Case for Using UML (03/02/05)
• frebe
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/29/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/29/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/29/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/29/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/29/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/29/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/28/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/28/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/28/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/28/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/28/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/28/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/28/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/28/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/26/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/23/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/21/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/21/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/21/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/21/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/21/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/21/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/20/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/20/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/20/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/20/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/20/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/20/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/20/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/20/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/19/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/18/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/18/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/18/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/13/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/13/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/13/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/13/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/13/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/13/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/13/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/12/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/12/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/12/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/12/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/11/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/11/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/11/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/11/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/11/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/10/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/10/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/10/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/10/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/09/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/04/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/04/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/04/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/04/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/04/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/04/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/04/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/04/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: OO programming - illumination? (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/02/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/02/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/02/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/02/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/01/05)
  • Re: OO programming - illumination? (03/01/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/01/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/01/05)
• freelancer
  • Re: Use Case Point Estimation (03/24/05)
• ggroups_at_bigfoot.com
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/15/05)
• Gibby Koldenhof
  • Definition of 'framework' (03/16/05)
• H. S. Lahman
  • Re: help with uml (03/29/05)
  • Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes. (03/29/05)
  • Re: Multiplicity of 0..1 on composition end (03/27/05)
  • Re: On the combination of AOP and GP (03/26/05)
  • Re: architectural concerns (03/25/05)
  • Re: interfaces in APIs (03/25/05)
  • Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes. (03/25/05)
  • Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes. (03/25/05)
  • Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes. (03/24/05)
  • Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes. (03/24/05)
  • Re: Reference Variables (03/23/05)
  • Re: Need help with an odd method (03/23/05)
  • Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes. (03/23/05)
  • Re: Factory Design Pattern and Select Case (03/20/05)
  • Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes. (03/20/05)
  • Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes. (03/19/05)
  • Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes. (03/18/05)
  • Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes. (03/18/05)
  • Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes. (03/17/05)
  • Re: Definition of 'framework' (03/17/05)
  • Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes. (03/16/05)
  • Re: Proper UML modeling (03/15/05)
  • Re: New job and I want to change the world... (03/15/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/11/05)
  • Re: Approach for the following scenario? (03/11/05)
  • Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically? (03/11/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/11/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/10/05)
  • Re: requirement engineering versus analysis (03/10/05)
  • Re: analysis and design definition (03/10/05)
  • Re: Practising UML (03/10/05)
  • Re: User Interface for the Printer Device Driver - Designing (Patterns) (03/07/05)
  • Re: Model Transformation Composition VS Model Weaving (03/04/05)
  • Re: creaping coupling...... (03/04/05)
  • Re: creaping coupling...... (03/04/05)
  • Re: creaping coupling...... (03/03/05)
  • Re: OO programming - illumination? (03/03/05)
  • Re: creaping coupling...... (03/03/05)
  • Re: Case for Using UML (03/02/05)
  • Re: experience definition in interview (03/02/05)
  • Re: OO programming - illumination? (03/02/05)
• Hal Rosser
  • Re: New job and I want to change the world... (03/15/05)
• Herb Sutter
  • Announce: C++ Connections Call For Papers (03/17/05)
• iamfractal_at_hotmail.com
  • Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes. (03/24/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/15/05)
  • Re: New job and I want to change the world... (03/15/05)
  • Re: Approach for the following scenario? (03/14/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/08/05)
  • Re: Case for Using UML (03/02/05)
  • Re: Case for Using UML (03/02/05)
• Ilja Preuß
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/29/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/17/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/16/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/16/05)
  • Re: New job and I want to change the world... (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/15/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/15/05)
  • Re: Proper UML modeling (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/12/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/12/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/11/05)
  • Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically? (03/11/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/11/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/10/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/04/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/04/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/04/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/04/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/04/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
• infobahn
  • Re: Case for Using UML (03/02/05)
• Isaac Gouy
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/08/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/08/05)
• Jan
  • Practising UML (03/08/05)
• jason
  • [ANN] Business Analyst with strong UML needed - East Sussex, England (03/24/05)
• Jason Hawryluk
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/26/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/25/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/25/05)
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/22/05)
  • Re: New job and I want to change the world... (03/17/05)
  • Re: New job and I want to change the world... (03/17/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/16/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/15/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/15/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/15/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/15/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/14/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/14/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/14/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/13/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/11/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/11/05)
• Jason Jones
  • [Ann] StS 2005 Key Note Speakers (03/29/05)
  • [Ann] Smalltalk Solutions 2005 Schedule (03/24/05)
  • [Ann] Smalltalk Solutions 2005 (03/21/05)
  • Smalltalk Solutions Coding Contest (03/01/05)
• Jeff
  • Re: OOA/OOD what should I read? (03/09/05)
• Jeff Brooks
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/21/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/20/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/20/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/20/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/20/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/20/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/20/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/20/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/20/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/20/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/20/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/20/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/20/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/20/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/20/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/13/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/13/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/13/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/13/05)
  • Re: Disadvantages of Inheritance, Polymorphism and Encapsulation (03/13/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/13/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/13/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/13/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/13/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/13/05)
  • Re: Approach for the following scenario? (03/13/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/13/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/12/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/12/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/10/05)
  • Re: Disadvantages of Inheritance, Polymorphism and Encapsulation (03/10/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/10/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/10/05)
  • Re: Disadvantages of Inheritance, Polymorphism and Encapsulation (03/10/05)
  • Re: Disadvantages of Inheritance, Polymorphism and Encapsulation (03/10/05)
  • Re: Disadvantages of Inheritance, Polymorphism and Encapsulation (03/10/05)
• John Urberg
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/29/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/28/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/28/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/25/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/25/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/18/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/12/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/12/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/11/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/10/05)
• Jonathan Allan
  • Re: experience definition in interview (03/01/05)
• jrefactors_at_hotmail.com
  • requirement engineering versus analysis (03/09/05)
  • analysis and design definition (03/09/05)
  • experience definition in interview (03/01/05)
• Juergen Wuest
  • Re: Design Patterns extraction (03/08/05)
• Juhan Leemet
  • Re: experience definition in interview (03/01/05)
• JXStern
  • Re: experience definition in interview (03/04/05)
• karen
  • Re: experience definition in interview (03/09/05)
• karl wettin
  • Redirections (03/22/05)
• karl.wettin_at_gmail.com
  • Re: help with uml (03/29/05)
  • Re: Multiplicity of 0..1 on composition end (03/27/05)
• kirkk
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/11/05)
• kurbylogic_at_hotmail.com
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/22/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/21/05)
• Kurt
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/25/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/24/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/24/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/23/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/23/05)
• Laurent Bossavit
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/26/05)
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/25/05)
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/25/05)
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/23/05)
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/23/05)
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/21/05)
  • Re: requirement engineering versus analysis (03/21/05)
  • Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically? (03/11/05)
• Lee Fesperman
  • Re: New job and I want to change the world... (03/15/05)
• LightningLAN Man
  • Computer Sale ( from cheap to high performance )! (03/22/05)
• Lurker
  • Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically? (03/28/05)
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/27/05)
  • Re: Computer Sale ( from cheap to high performance )! (03/27/05)
  • Re: overloading - need good approach (03/27/05)
  • Re: Multiplicity of 0..1 on composition end (03/27/05)
  • Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically? (03/27/05)
  • Re: overloading - need good approach (03/27/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/23/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/21/05)
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/20/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/20/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/20/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/20/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/20/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/20/05)
  • Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically? (03/19/05)
  • Re: New job and I want to change the world... (03/19/05)
• Marc Rohloff
  • Do developers think more textually than graphically? (03/11/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/10/05)
• Mark Nicholls
  • Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes. (03/29/05)
  • Re: Factory Design Pattern and Select Case (03/24/05)
  • Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes. (03/24/05)
  • Re: Factory Design Pattern and Select Case (03/24/05)
  • Re: Factory Design Pattern and Select Case (03/24/05)
  • Re: Factory Design Pattern and Select Case (03/23/05)
  • Re: Factory Design Pattern and Select Case (03/23/05)
  • Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes. (03/22/05)
  • Re: Factory Design Pattern and Select Case (03/22/05)
  • Re: Factory Design Pattern and Select Case (03/22/05)
  • Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes. (03/17/05)
  • Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes. (03/17/05)
  • Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes. (03/17/05)
• Martijn Mulder
  • Re: MVC in C++ (03/01/05)
• Matthias Hofmann
  • Re: Multiplicity of 0..1 on composition end (03/30/05)
  • Re: Multiplicity of 0..1 on composition end (03/30/05)
  • Re: Multiplicity of 0..1 on composition end (03/30/05)
  • Multiplicity of 0..1 on composition end (03/26/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/25/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/21/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/20/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/17/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/16/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/16/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/14/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/14/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/14/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/13/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/13/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/13/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/12/05)
  • Designing my finite state machine (03/10/05)
• Matthieu Villeneuve
  • Re: what is a "typed" OO language? (03/01/05)
• Michal Kleczek
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/29/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/29/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/29/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/29/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/29/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/29/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/28/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/25/05)
• Miguel Oliveira e Silva
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/09/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/09/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/09/05)
• Mike Bandor
  • Re: How to write Request For Proposal (RFP) in Information Technology? (03/07/05)
• mikharakiri_nospaum_at_yahoo.com
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/08/05)
• Mikito Harakiri
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
• Mr Frank
  • Re: Factory Design Pattern and Select Case (03/26/05)
  • Re: Factory Design Pattern and Select Case (03/25/05)
  • Re: Factory Design Pattern and Select Case (03/25/05)
  • Re: Factory Design Pattern and Select Case (03/25/05)
  • Re: Factory Design Pattern and Select Case (03/24/05)
• nattygur_at_gmail.com
  • A new Enterprise Architecture online user group. (03/24/05)
• Neo
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/22/05)
  • Modelling Persons with Variable Classifications, Attributes and Values (with XDb3) (03/16/05)
• Otavio C. Decio
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
• Patricia Shanahan
  • Re: New job and I want to change the world... (03/17/05)
  • Re: New job and I want to change the world... (03/15/05)
  • Re: New job and I want to change the world... (03/15/05)
• Patrick May
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/23/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/23/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/21/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/21/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/20/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/19/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/18/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/13/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/10/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/08/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/04/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
• paul campbell
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/28/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/28/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/28/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/21/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/20/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/14/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/13/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/13/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/13/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/09/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/08/05)
• Paul MG
  • interfaces in APIs (03/24/05)
• Phlip
  • Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically? (03/28/05)
  • Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically? (03/27/05)
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/26/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/25/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/25/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/23/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/22/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/22/05)
  • Re: Use Case Point Estimation (03/22/05)
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/21/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/20/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/20/05)
  • Re: How would u see MVP working with a Wizard? (03/20/05)
  • Re: Factory Design Pattern and Select Case (03/19/05)
  • Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically? (03/18/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/16/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/15/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/15/05)
  • Re: Proper UML modeling (03/15/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/14/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/14/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/12/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/12/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/12/05)
  • Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically? (03/11/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/11/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/09/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/09/05)
  • Re: requirement engineering versus analysis (03/09/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/08/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/08/05)
  • Re: Case for Using UML (03/04/05)
  • Re: experience definition in interview (03/03/05)
  • Re: Case for Using UML (03/02/05)
  • Re: Case for Using UML (03/02/05)
  • Re: Case for Using UML (03/02/05)
  • Re: experience definition in interview (03/01/05)
• QuantDev
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/13/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/08/05)
• quantdev2004_at_yahoo.co.uk
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/09/05)
  • The design is the code? (03/08/05)
• Remi Bastide
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/16/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/15/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/15/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/14/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/14/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/11/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/11/05)
• Rene de Visser
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/09/05)
• Rich MacDonald
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/30/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/30/05)
  • Re: overloading - need good approach (03/27/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/23/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/23/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/23/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/23/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/23/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/23/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/22/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/21/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/21/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/21/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/17/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/17/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/16/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/16/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/15/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/15/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/13/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/13/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/12/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/12/05)
• Robert C. Martin
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/30/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/30/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/30/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/28/05)
  • Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes. (03/25/05)
  • Re: Factory Design Pattern and Select Case (03/24/05)
  • Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes. (03/24/05)
  • Re: Factory Design Pattern and Select Case (03/23/05)
  • Re: Factory Design Pattern and Select Case (03/22/05)
  • Re: Factory Design Pattern and Select Case (03/22/05)
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/22/05)
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/21/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/21/05)
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/20/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/20/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/20/05)
  • Re: Factory Design Pattern and Select Case (03/20/05)
  • Re: How would u see MVP working with a Wizard? (03/20/05)
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/20/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/19/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/19/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: Proper UML modeling (03/17/05)
  • Re: New job and I want to change the world... (03/17/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/17/05)
  • Design is intent. (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/14/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/14/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/14/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/14/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/13/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/13/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/13/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/13/05)
  • Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically? (03/11/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/11/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/11/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/11/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/10/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/10/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/09/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/09/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/09/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/09/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/09/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/09/05)
  • Re: Practising UML (03/08/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/04/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: creaping coupling...... (03/03/05)
  • Re: creaping coupling...... (03/03/05)
  • Re: creaping coupling...... (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/02/05)
  • Re: Case for Using UML (03/02/05)
  • Re: creaping coupling...... (02/28/05)
• Ron Jeffries
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/09/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/09/05)
• Roy Smith
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/13/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/13/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/13/05)
  • Re: what is a "typed" OO language? (03/01/05)
• Rémi Bastide
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/18/05)
• s7ry93r
  • Re: Approach for the following scenario? (03/11/05)
  • Approach for the following scenario? (03/11/05)
• Saurabh Aggrawal
  • Re: Design Patterns extraction (03/18/05)
  • Design Patterns extraction (03/07/05)
  • User Interface for the Printer Device Driver - Designing (Patterns) (03/07/05)
• Scott Ellsworth
  • Re: New job and I want to change the world... (03/15/05)
• Scott Kinney
  • Re: analysis and design definition (03/10/05)
• Secret Squirrel
  • architectural concerns (03/25/05)
• Shane Mingins
  • How would u see MVP working with a Wizard? (03/18/05)
  • Re: New job and I want to change the world... (03/15/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/10/05)
• Shayne Wissler
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/27/05)
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/26/05)
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/25/05)
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/23/05)
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/23/05)
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/22/05)
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/22/05)
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/22/05)
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/21/05)
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/20/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/20/05)
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/20/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/17/05)
  • Re: Design is intent. (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/15/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/15/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/15/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/15/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/14/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/14/05)
  • Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically? (03/12/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/12/05)
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/09/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/04/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/04/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/04/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/04/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/04/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/04/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
• Simo Melenius
  • Re: The design is the code? (03/16/05)
• slowhand
  • Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes. (03/15/05)
• smilemac
  • Re: requirement engineering versus analysis (03/24/05)
• SP
  • Re: New job and I want to change the world... (03/17/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/12/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/12/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/12/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/11/05)
• steve
  • Re: New job and I want to change the world... (03/17/05)
• suraj
  • Use Case Point Estimation (03/22/05)
• Thomas Gagne
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/29/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/28/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/28/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/28/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/23/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/17/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/15/05)
  • Re: New job and I want to change the world... (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/10/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/10/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/01/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/01/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/01/05)
• Tools
  • Re: OOA/OOD what should I read? (03/07/05)
• topmind
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/30/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/27/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/24/05)
  • Re: (",) Do You Want To Know For Sure You Are Going To Heaven? (03/23/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/22/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/22/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/22/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/21/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/21/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/20/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/19/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/19/05)
  • Re: New job and I want to change the world... (03/16/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/16/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/16/05)
  • Re: New job and I want to change the world... (03/15/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/14/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/14/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/14/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/14/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/14/05)
  • Re: Disadvantages of Inheritance, Polymorphism and Encapsulation (03/12/05)
  • Re: Approach for the following scenario? (03/12/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/12/05)
  • Re: OO vs. RDB challenge (03/11/05)
  • Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically? (03/11/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/10/05)
  • Re: Disadvantages of Inheritance, Polymorphism and Encapsulation (03/10/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/08/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/08/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/07/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/06/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/05/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/04/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/04/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
  • Re: Application logic and Business logic (03/03/05)
• TranzMatt
  • Case for Using UML (03/01/05)
• vb_at_cybertester.com
  • Re: A New Series of Books and Software (03/06/05)
• VisionSet
  • Re: New job and I want to change the world... (03/18/05)
  • Re: New job and I want to change the world... (03/17/05)
  • Re: New job and I want to change the world... (03/17/05)
  • Re: New job and I want to change the world... (03/16/05)
  • Re: New job and I want to change the world... (03/16/05)
  • Re: New job and I want to change the world... (03/16/05)
  • New job and I want to change the world... (03/14/05)
• Wavemaker
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/22/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/17/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/16/05)
  • Re: Designing my finite state machine (03/14/05)
• wzack
  • The New York Chapter of The International Association of Software Architects - Meetings (03/13/05)
  • New York City - Announcement - New Software Architecture Group (03/07/05)
• xpyttl
  • Re: experience definition in interview (03/01/05)

Last message date: 03/30/05
Archived on: 03/30/05 CEST

---

1223 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(14)