comp.object

• Thread Index

---

• Re: inherited composition
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Lahman, how ya doing?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: When and where to use Visitor Pattern?
  • From: Rich MacDonald
• Re: When and where to use Visitor Pattern?
  • From: Wavemaker
• Re: UML metamodel
  • From: topmind
• Re: When and where to use Visitor Pattern?
  • From: topmind
• Re: When and where to use Visitor Pattern?
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: When and where to use Visitor Pattern?
  • From: paul campbell
• Re: When and where to use Visitor Pattern?
  • From: paul campbell
• Re: Lahman, how ya doing?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: inherited composition
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Something about ACTIVE OBJECT pattern
  • From: adaworks
• Re: Lahman, how ya doing?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: E-book?
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: When and where to use Visitor Pattern?
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: Confusion about splitting classes to allow sharing of resources
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: When and where to use Visitor Pattern?
  • From: Nicholls . Mark
• Re: When and where to use Visitor Pattern?
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Something about ACTIVE OBJECT pattern
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• inherited composition
  • From: karl wettin
• Re: [Q] XP and Estimation
  • From: Ron Jeffries
• Re: When and where to use Visitor Pattern?
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: Confusion about splitting classes to allow sharing of resources
  • From: m.a.stijnman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: When and where to use Visitor Pattern?
  • From: Nicholls . Mark
• [Q] XP and Estimation
  • From: Ashima Goswamy
• E-book?
  • From: SJ
• Re: Something about ACTIVE OBJECT pattern
  • From: adaworks
• Re: When and where to use Visitor Pattern?
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: When and where to use Visitor Pattern?
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: Lahman, how ya doing?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: complicated emulation problem
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: UML metamodel
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Lahman, how ya doing?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: When and where to use Visitor Pattern?
  • From: Lorenzo Bettini
• Re: When and where to use Visitor Pattern?
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: When and where to use Visitor Pattern?
  • From: Wavemaker
• Re: Lahman, how ya doing?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: When and where to use Visitor Pattern?
  • From: Rich MacDonald
• Re: When and where to use Visitor Pattern?
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: Lahman, how ya doing?
  • From: cstb
• complicated emulation problem
  • From: Tim Woodburn
• Re: Lahman, how ya doing?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Lahman, how ya doing?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: UML metamodel
  • From: Davor
• Re: When and where to use Visitor Pattern?
  • From: Roger L. Cauvin
• UML metamodel
  • From: Antonio Santiago
• Re: When and where to use Visitor Pattern?
  • From: Nicholls . Mark
• Re: object vs type
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: author of this article?
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: When and where to use Visitor Pattern?
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: When and where to use Visitor Pattern?
  • From: Rich MacDonald
• DOES ANY GLASS CLEANERS WANT THEIR PAPER WORK DONE EVERY DAY
  • From: tryntohard
• Re: Lahman, how ya doing?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Who can find this paper on the net?
  • From: Roland
• Re: Lahman, how ya doing?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Who can find this paper on the net?
  • From: oldbull
• Re: responsibilites - 'active' and 'passive' classes
  • From: Cristiano Sadun
• refactoring java
  • From: Lukasz
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: adaworks
• Re: Lahman, how ya doing?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Lahman, how ya doing?
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: author of this article?
  • From: Lurker
• Re: author of this article?
  • From: Phlip
• Re: author of this article?
  • From: frebe
• Lahman, how ya doing?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: author of this article?
  • From: Phlip
• Re: author of this article?
  • From: frebe
• Re: author of this article?
  • From: Davor
• Re: author of this article?
  • From: Phlip
• Re: author of this article?
  • From: frebe
• Re: When and where to use Visitor Pattern?
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: agile methods compared?
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: author of this article?
  • From: Phlip
• Re: author of this article?
  • From: frebe
• Re: When and where to use Visitor Pattern?
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: author of this article?
  • From: Sean Winship
• Re: author of this article?
  • From: Davor
• Re: author of this article?
  • From: Phlip
• Re: author of this article?
  • From: Davor
• Re: author of this article?
  • From: Phlip
• Re: author of this article?
  • From: krasicki
• author of this article?
  • From: Davor
• Multi site - data collecting and processing machines
  • From: orencs
• Re: audit log on normalized data
  • From: frebe
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: adaworks
• Re: When and where to use Visitor Pattern?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: audit log on normalized data
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: When and where to use Visitor Pattern?
  • From: Remi Bastide
• Re: When and where to use Visitor Pattern?
  • From: Calum Grant
• Re: audit log on normalized data
  • From: Secret Squirrel
• Re: agile methods compared?
  • From: Davor
• Re: Confusion about splitting classes to allow sharing of resources
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: When and where to use Visitor Pattern?
  • From: oldbull
• When and where to use Visitor Pattern?
  • From: Sam Hwang
• Re: agile methods compared?
  • From: woyna@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Q about UML Negative CombinedFragment
  • From: oldbull
• Q about UML Negative CombinedFragment
  • From: oldbull
• agile methods compared?
  • From: Davor
• Re: Confusion about splitting classes to allow sharing of resources
  • From: m.a.stijnman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: audit log on normalized data
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Confusion about splitting classes to allow sharing of resources
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: frebe
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: narke
• Re: Confusion about splitting classes to allow sharing of resources
  • From: m.a.stijnman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Looking for UML Diagrams exercises + solutions
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• audit log on normalized data
  • From: Secret Squirrel
• Re: Confusion about splitting classes to allow sharing of resources
  • From: Hang Dog
• Re: Confusion about splitting classes to allow sharing of resources
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: responsibilites - 'active' and 'passive' classes
  • From: ian ward
• Re: responsibilites - 'active' and 'passive' classes
  • From: ian ward
• Re: Confusion about splitting classes to allow sharing of resources
  • From: m.a.stijnman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: responsibilites - 'active' and 'passive' classes
  • From: iamfractal
• Re: Looking for UML Diagrams exercises + solutions
  • From: Nananana
• Re: Confusion about splitting classes to allow sharing of resources
  • From: Hang Dog
• Confusion about splitting classes to allow sharing of resources
  • From: m.a.stijnman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: a UML tool light on resources
  • From: iamfractal
• Re: a UML tool light on resources
  • From: Tools
• Re: UML documents for open source projects?
  • From: Tools
• Re: responsibilites - 'active' and 'passive' classes
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Looking for UML Diagrams exercises + solutions
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: responsibilites - 'active' and 'passive' classes
  • From: Charles Krug
• responsibilites - 'active' and 'passive' classes
  • From: ian ward
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: frebe
• Looking for UML Diagrams exercises + solutions
  • From: Nananana
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: narke
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: frebe
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: narke
• Re: a UML tool light on resources
  • From: Davor
• Re: polymorphism and dynamically typed languages
  • From: Ron Jeffries
• Re: a UML tool light on resources
  • From: Berislav Lopac
• Re: polymorphism and dynamically typed languages
  • From: cstb
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: frebe
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: frebe
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: narke
• Re: Using C Structs as C++ Objects : Info Please!
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: Larry C Moe
• Re: a UML tool light on resources
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: A Question about Domain Object
  • From: narke
• Re: a UML tool light on resources
  • From: Tobin Harris
• Re: a UML tool light on resources
  • From: Paul Herber
• Re: a UML tool light on resources
  • From: Shane Mingins
• Re: Using C Structs as C++ Objects : Info Please!
  • From: DaVinci
• a UML tool light on resources
  • From: Davor
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: frebe
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: Larry C Moe
• Re: Using C Structs as C++ Objects : Info Please!
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Using C Structs as C++ Objects : Info Please!
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: How to pronouce "use-case"
  • From: Ron Jeffries
• Re: How to pronouce "use-case"
  • From: Lurker
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: frebe
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: Larry C Moe
• Re: object vs type
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: frebe
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: narke
• Re: Using C Structs as C++ Objects : Info Please!
  • From: Mike Austin
• Re: How to pronouce "use-case"
  • From: Ron Jeffries
• Re: A Question about Domain Object
  • From: asdf
• Re: How to pronouce "use-case"
  • From: asdf
• Using C Structs as C++ Objects : Info Please!
  • From: DaVinci
• Re: A Question about Domain Object
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: frebe
• Re: Question about Martin's Story Point Progress Tracking
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Question about Martin's Story Point Progress Tracking
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: State chart question
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: Larry C Moe
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: frebe
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: frebe
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: narke
• Re: A Question about Domain Object
  • From: narke
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: EricF
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: frebe
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: Larry Curly Moe
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: topmind
• Re: A Question about Domain Object
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: State chart question
  • From: Jeffrey Spoon
• Re: State chart question
  • From: Davor
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: frebe
• Re: Question about Martin's Story Point Progress Tracking
  • From: Phlip
• Re: A Question about Domain Object
  • From: Universe
• Re: Question about Martin's Story Point Progress Tracking
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Question about Martin's Story Point Progress Tracking
  • From: Phlip
• Re: How to pronouce "use-case"
  • From: Universe
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: Larry Curly Moe
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: frebe
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: narke
• Re: Question about Martin's Story Point Progress Tracking
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: frebe
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: frebe
• Re: consulting/teaching OOA/D experiences?
  • From: Davor
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: frebe
• Re: consulting/teaching OOA/D experiences?
  • From: Davor
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: narke
• Re: consulting/teaching OOA/D experiences?
  • From: Alex Kay
• Re: Question about Martin's Story Point Progress Tracking
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: consulting/teaching OOA/D experiences?
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: State chart question
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: State chart question
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: A Question about Domain Object
  • From: narke
• Re: Supercomputer and encryption and compression @ rate of 96%
  • From: Calum Grant
• Re: State chart question
  • From: Davor
• Re: Discovering concepts - what techniques?
  • From: Universe
• Re: How to pronouce "use-case"
  • From: Universe
• Re: A Question about Domain Object
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: UML documents for open source projects?
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Question about Martin's Story Point Progress Tracking
  • From: Phlip
• Question about Martin's Story Point Progress Tracking
  • From: kk_oop
• Re: How to pronouce "use-case"
  • From: Charles Krug
• Re: UML documents for open source projects?
  • From: Universe
• UML documents for open source projects?
  • From: chef
• Re: How to pronouce "use-case"
  • From: Universe
• Re: Semi-Off-Topic: Online education
  • From: Universe
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Universe
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: Larry Curly Moe
• Re: A Question about Domain Object
  • From: narke
• Re: Parallel multi-relational collections
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: State chart question
  • From: Remi Bastide
• Re: Parallel multi-relational collections
  • From: frebe
• Re: consulting/teaching OOA/D experiences?
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: frebe
• Re: consulting/teaching OOA/D experiences?
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: State chart question
  • From: Davor
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: Larry Curly Moe
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: Larry Curly Moe
• Re: Parallel multi-relational collections
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: comp.object.process - comp.object.technical - comp.object.theory ?
  • From: Universe
• Re: Bridge Pattern
  • From: Universe
• Re: A Question about Domain Object
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: consulting/teaching OOA/D experiences?
  • From: Phlip
• Re: consulting/teaching OOA/D experiences?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Parallel multi-relational collections
  • From: Calum Grant
• Re: Parallel multi-relational collections
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Universe
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: comp.object.process - comp.object.technical - comp.object.theory ?
  • From: karl wettin
• Re: State chart question
  • From: Jeffrey Spoon
• A Question about Domain Object
  • From: narke
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Charles Krug
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: frebe
• Re: State chart question
  • From: Remi Bastide
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: narke
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Tim Tyler
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: EricF
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: frebe
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: narke
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: topmind
• Semi-Off-Topic: Online education
  • From: Eric A. Johnson
• Re: Parallel multi-relational collections
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: consulting/teaching OOA/D experiences?
  • From: Davor
• Re: consulting/teaching OOA/D experiences?
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Application logic and Business logic
  • From: techsupport
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: techsupport
• Re: State chart question
  • From: Jeffrey Spoon
• Re: design a sql generator...
  • From: Calum Grant
• Re: Parallel multi-relational collections
  • From: Calum Grant
• consulting/teaching OOA/D experiences?
  • From: Davor
• Re: Parallel multi-relational collections
  • From: frebe
• Re: Parallel multi-relational collections
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• comp.object.process - comp.object.technical - comp.object.theory ?
  • From: elliott . coates
• Re: Parallel multi-relational collections
  • From: frebe
• Bridge Pattern
  • From: bks
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Parallel multi-relational collections
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: Complex application flow. Best approach ???
  • From: Jan
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: alex99
• Re: Complex application flow. Best approach ???
  • From: Jan
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: frebe
• Re: design a sql generator...
  • From: Shane Mingins
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: narke
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: frebe
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: narke
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: EricF
• Re: Parallel multi-relational collections
  • From: frebe
• design a sql generator...
  • From: labatt
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Something about ACTIVE OBJECT pattern
  • From: adaworks
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: adaworks
• Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically?
  • From: elliott . coates
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Dave Benjamin
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Dave Benjamin
• Re: verfication, validation and test in object world
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: About starting by creating a domain model, and elaborating it to a design
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Discovering concepts - what techniques?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Phlip
• Re: State chart question
  • From: Davor
• Re: Parallel multi-relational collections
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Davor
• Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically?
  • From: Marc Rohloff
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: frebe
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: bruno modulix
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: narke
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Dave Benjamin
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: frebe
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: narke
• Perfecting Google's Rankings: A Collaborative Ranking Experiment
  • From: Amir Michail
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: adaworks
• Re: About starting by creating a domain model, and elaborating it to a design
  • From: Phlip
• Re: verfication, validation and test in object world
  • From: sam
• Re: About starting by creating a domain model, and elaborating it to a design
  • From: Davor
• Re: About starting by creating a domain model, and elaborating it to a design
  • From: Shane Mingins
• Re: About starting by creating a domain model, and elaborating it to a design
  • From: Davor
• Re: About starting by creating a domain model, and elaborating it to a design
  • From: Davor
• Re: About starting by creating a domain model, and elaborating it to a design
  • From: Davor
• Re: Discovering concepts - what techniques?
  • From: Davor
• Re: State chart question
  • From: Jeffrey Spoon
• Re: State chart question
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: About starting by creating a domain model, and elaborating it to a design
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: About starting by creating a domain model, and elaborating it to a design
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Complex application flow. Best approach ???
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Something about ACTIVE OBJECT pattern
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: verfication, validation and test in object world
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: State chart question
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Complex application flow. Best approach ???
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Lurker
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: frebe
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Lurker
• Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically?
  • From: Tim Tyler
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Lurker
• Re: How to pronouce "use-case"
  • From: Lurker
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: narke
• Re: verfication, validation and test in object world
  • From: EventHelix.com
• Re: Complex application flow. Best approach ???
  • From: Jan
• Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically?
  • From: AndyW
• verfication, validation and test in object world
  • From: sam
• State chart question
  • From: Jeffrey Spoon
• Re: About starting by creating a domain model, and elaborating it to a design
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: UML Query
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically?
  • From: Tim Tyler
• Re: How to pronouce "use-case"
  • From: Calum Grant
• Re: How to pronouce "use-case"
  • From: iamfractal
• Re: Parallel multi-relational collections
  • From: Fredrik Bertilsson
• Re: Complex application flow. Best approach ???
  • From: alex99
• Re: About starting by creating a domain model, and elaborating it to a design
  • From: Phlip
• About starting by creating a domain model, and elaborating it to a design
  • From: Davor
• Re: How to pronouce "use-case"
  • From: Calum Grant
• Re: Parallel multi-relational collections
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Discovering concepts - what techniques?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Complex application flow. Best approach ???
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Complex application flow. Best approach ???
  • From: Jan
• Re: How to pronouce "use-case"
  • From: iamfractal
• Re: Parallel multi-relational collections
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: Parallel multi-relational collections
  • From: frebe
• Re: Complex application flow. Best approach ???
  • From: alex99
• Re: Parallel multi-relational collections
  • From: Marv
• Re: Something about ACTIVE OBJECT pattern
  • From: Jeremiah L.Jiang
• Re: Parallel multi-relational collections
  • From: Berislav Lopac
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: frebe
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: EricF
• Re: How to pronouce "use-case"
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Rich MacDonald
• Re: overloading - need good approach
  • From: elliott . coates
• UML Query
  • From: arun . hallan
• Re: Parallel multi-relational collections
  • From: frebe
• How to pronouce "use-case"
  • From: Calum Grant
• Re: Parallel multi-relational collections
  • From: cstb
• Re: Parallel multi-relational collections
  • From: Marv
• Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes.
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Parallel multi-relational collections
  • From: Berislav Lopac
• Re: Parallel multi-relational collections
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Parallel multi-relational collections
  • From: Marv
• Announce - Book - Agile Development With Iconix Process
  • From: Mark Collins-Cope
• Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes.
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Complex application flow. Best approach ???
  • From: Jan
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: narke
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Dave Benjamin
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: EricF
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: alex99
• Re: OO vs. RDB challenge
  • From: topmind
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: narke
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: topmind
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically?
  • From: krasicki
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: krasicki
• Discovering concepts - what techniques?
  • From: Davor
• Re: Complex application flow. Best approach ???
  • From: alex99
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Charles Krug
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: alex99
• Complex application flow. Best approach ???
  • From: Jan
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: cstb
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Something about ACTIVE OBJECT pattern
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Bjorn Reese
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Dave Benjamin
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Bjorn Reese
• Re: How would u see MVP working with a Wizard?
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Calum Grant
• Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes.
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes.
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes.
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Is there an "Observer-like" pattern for external data?
  • From: alex99
• Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes.
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Application logic and Business logic
  • From: iamfractal
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: iamfractal
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: EventHelix.com
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: Application logic and Business logic
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes.
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: alex99
• Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?
  • From: narke
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: Application logic and Business logic
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes.
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Application logic and Business logic
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Andrew McDonagh
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Calum Grant
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Duck Dodgers
• Correctness is ALWAYS conditional
  • From: whopkins
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Otavio Decio
• Re: Is there an "Observer-like" pattern for external data?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Otavio Decio
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Charles Krug
• Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes.
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Duck Dodgers
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Shayne Wissler
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Duck Dodgers
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Shayne Wissler
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Phlip
• Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Duck Dodgers
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Shayne Wissler
• Re: Application logic and Business logic
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes.
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Bjorn Reese
• Re: Application logic and Business logic
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: Application logic and Business logic
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Lurker
• Re: Is there an "Observer-like" pattern for external data?
  • From: Saurabh Aggrawal
• Re: Is there an "Observer-like" pattern for external data?
  • From: alex99
• Re: Design pattern for decoupling UI from data
  • From: Saurabh Aggrawal
• Re: Application logic and Business logic
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes.
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Application logic and Business logic
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Application logic and Business logic
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Application logic and Business logic
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Design pattern for decoupling UI from data
  • From: Shane Mingins
• Re: Is there an "Observer-like" pattern for external data?
  • From: Charles Krug
• Re: Is there an "Observer-like" pattern for external data?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes.
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OO vs. RDB challenge
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Shayne Wissler
• Re: OO vs. RDB challenge
  • From: frebe
• Re: Application logic and Business logic
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Application logic and Business logic
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: Application logic and Business logic
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: Application logic and Business logic
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: Application logic and Business logic
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: Attaching a behavior only to multiple classes.
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OO vs. RDB challenge
  • From: frebe
• Re: OO vs. RDB challenge
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Bjorn Reese
• Design pattern for decoupling UI from data
  • From: Martin Magnusson
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Laurent Bossavit
• Something about ACTIVE OBJECT pattern
  • From: Jeremiah L.Jiang
• Re: Application logic and Business logic
  • From: Thomas Gagne
• Re: OO vs. RDB challenge
  • From: Thomas Gagne
• Re: OO vs. RDB challenge
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically?
  • From: AndyW
• Is there an "Observer-like" pattern for external data?
  • From: Charles Krug
• Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically?
  • From: alex99
• Re: How would u see MVP working with a Wizard?
  • From: alex99
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Michael N. Christoff
• Re: OO vs. RDB challenge
  • From: Jeff Brooks
• Re: OO vs. RDB challenge
  • From: Jeff Brooks
• Re: Application logic and Business logic
  • From: Jeff Brooks
• Re: Application logic and Business logic
  • From: Jeff Brooks
• Re: Application logic and Business logic
  • From: Jeff Brooks
• Re: Application logic and Business logic
  • From: Jeff Brooks
• Re: OO vs. RDB challenge
  • From: Jeff Brooks
• Re: OO vs. RDB challenge
  • From: Jeff Brooks
• Re: OO vs. RDB challenge
  • From: Jeff Brooks
• Re: Application logic and Business logic
  • From: Jeff Brooks
• Re: Application logic and Business logic
  • From: Jeff Brooks
• Re: OO vs. RDB challenge
  • From: Jeff Brooks
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically?
  • From: Laurent Bossavit
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Calum Grant
• Re: How would u see MVP working with a Wizard?
  • From: Shane Mingins
• Re: How would u see MVP working with a Wizard?
  • From: Shane Mingins
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically?
  • From: Lurker
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Laurent Bossavit
• Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically?
  • From: Laurent Bossavit
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Lurker
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Lurker
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Lurker
• [ANN] The Agile Unified Process (AUP) (The Art of Agility)
  • From: salhir@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Lurker
• Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically?
  • From: Lurker
• Re: Do developers think more textually than graphically?
  • From: Lurker
• Re: overloading - need good approach
  • From: Lurker
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Michael N. Christoff
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Michael N. Christoff
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Calum Grant
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Laurent Bossavit
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Calum Grant
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Calum Grant
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Bjorn Reese
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Michael N. Christoff
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Michael N. Christoff
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Michael N. Christoff
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: topmind
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Shayne Wissler
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Comparing Use Case Points and Function Points
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Bjorn Reese
• Re: Multiplicity of 0..1 on composition end
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: How would u see MVP working with a Wizard?
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: (",) Do You Want To Know For Sure You Are Going To Heaven?
  • From: bruno modulix
• Re: How would u see MVP working with a Wizard?
  • From: alex99
• Re: How would u see MVP working with a Wizard?
  • From: Shane Mingins
• Re: How would u see MVP working with a Wizard?
  • From: alex99
• Re: How would u see MVP working with a Wizard?
  • From: Shane Mingins
• Re: Multiplicity of 0..1 on composition end
  • From: Matthias Hofmann
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Comparing Use Case Points and Function Points
  • From: freelancer
• Re: OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: How would u see MVP working with a Wizard?
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• OO like natural language say researchers
  • From: Michael N. Christoff
• Re: Multiplicity of 0..1 on composition end
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Multiplicity of 0..1 on composition end
  • From: Matthias Hofmann
• Re: How would u see MVP working with a Wizard?
  • From: Shane Mingins
• Re: OO vs. RDB challenge
  • From: Rich MacDonald
• Re: OO vs. RDB challenge
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Application logic and Business logic
  • From: John Urberg
• Re: OO vs. RDB challenge
  • From: Costin Cozianu
• Re: OO vs. RDB challenge
  • From: paul campbell
• Re: Help: problems installing Rational Rose with Windows XP Home Edition
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Multiplicity of 0..1 on composition end
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OO vs. RDB challenge
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: Application logic and Business logic
  • From: frebe
• Re: OO vs. RDB challenge
  • From: frebe

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(15)