Re: Application logic and Business logic
- From: Jeff Brooks <jeff_brooks@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 17:21:44 GMT
topmind wrote:
refusal to support assertions
Before you start playing lawyer, next time *ask* if an off-the-cuff remark is meant to be a formal assertation.
and clear demonstrations of a lack of understanding of the technology being discussed in this newsgroup.
Sour Grapes from the Proofless One. Poor debaters tend to attack the intelligence or background of their advesaries.
If you have no evidence for separation betterment (outside of device
drivers), then please go away.
But you don't have evidence to support your views?! Does that mean you should go away?
Jeff Brooks .
- Prev by Date: Re: Application logic and Business logic
- Next by Date: Re: OO vs. RDB challenge
- Previous by thread: Re: Application logic and Business logic
- Next by thread: Re: Application logic and Business logic
- Index(es):