Re: Is there a BEA Tuxedo equivalence in Java?

In article <1113189211.532520.165850@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "narke" <steven@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Fredrik Bertilsson wrote,
>
>> Before you start using a J2EE server like JBoss, define the features
>you need first. The main reason using a J2EE server is EJB. If you are
>not looking for EJB-support, a more light-weight option is better.
>
>I think my core needs is to get the ability of remote objecting. On one
>hand, those remote objects are all communication objects or control
>objects which response to requests from gui clients. Those persistent
>objects (entities) do not have to be remotable, they reside on the same
>computer where communication and control objects running. On the other
>hand, these server side objects shuld be well controled in a way such
>as trasaction ACID.
>
>For my needs, do you think I need EJB? If not, is there any other
>light-weight option when having consider that has to be in Java.
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>-
>narke

If you are competing with a Tuxedo based product, I think you need a framework
that scales well and handles hi volume transactions. You probably need a
product that is reasonably fault tolerant. Yes, I think you need EJB.

Eric
.